98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is a symptom complex affecting 12-14% of the UK adult female population. Symptoms include urinary urgency, with or without urgency incontinence, increased daytime urinary frequency and nocturia. OAB has a negative impact on women's social, physical, and psychological wellbeing. Initial treatment includes lifestyle modifications, bladder retraining, pelvic floor exercises and pharmacological therapy. However, these measures are unsuccessful in 25-40% of women (refractory OAB). Before considering invasive treatments, such as Botulinum toxin injection or sacral neuromodulation, most guidelines recommend urodynamics to confirm diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO). However, urodynamics may fail to show evidence of DO in up to 45% of cases, hence the need to evaluate its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. FUTURE (Female Urgency, Trial of Urodynamics as Routine Evaluation) aims to test the hypothesis that, in women with refractory OAB, urodynamics and comprehensive clinical assessment is associated with superior patient-reported outcomes following treatment and is more cost-effective, compared to comprehensive clinical assessment only.
Methods: FUTURE is a pragmatic, multi-centre, superiority randomised controlled trial. Women aged ≥ 18 years with refractory OAB or urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence, and who have failed/not tolerated conservative and medical treatment, are considered for trial entry. We aim to recruit 1096 women from approximately 60 secondary/tertiary care hospitals across the UK. All consenting women will complete questionnaires at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 15 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome is participant-reported success at 15 months post-randomisation measured using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The primary economic outcome is incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained at 15 months. The secondary outcomes include adverse events, impact on other urinary symptoms and health-related quality of life. Qualitative interviews with participants and clinicians and a health economic evaluation will also be conducted. The statistical analysis of the primary outcome will be by intention-to-treat. Results will be presented as estimates and 95% CIs.
Discussion: The FUTURE study will inform patients, clinicians and policy makers whether routine urodynamics improves treatment outcomes in women with refractory OAB and whether it is cost-effective.
Trial Registration: ISRCTN63268739 . Registered on 14 September 2017.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8546752 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05661-3 | DOI Listing |
Pain Med Case Rep
December 2023
Department of Anesthesiology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Background: Centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome (CAPS) is a condition that has traditionally been treated with first-line agents, such as tricyclic anti-depressants and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. However, in the setting of pain refractory to these primary agents, there is little evidence in support of alternative regimens, especially opioid analgesics.
Case Report: This case examines the utility of weekly 10 mcg transdermal buprenorphine patches as an additional treatment modality for CAPS, specifically in the setting of a 27-year-old woman with intractable abdominal pain following a cholecystectomy.
Pain Med Case Rep
December 2023
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive neuromodulation treatment modality primarily used for failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), complex regional pain syndrome, and diabetic neuropathy. Specifically, when utilized for the treatment of FBSS, placement can be complicated by the excessive scarring, adhesions, and altered anatomy limiting the access to the epidural space and advancement of the leads.
Case Report: Our patient is a 58-year-old woman with a history of scoliosis and severe lumbar spinal stenosis who presented for trial of an SCS for FBSS.
Pain Med Case Rep
October 2023
Adena Medical Center, Chilicothe, OH.
Background: Peripheral nerve stimulation has been available for many years, yet there is relatively little information available regarding stimulation of many of the large sensory and mixed nerves.
Case Report: A 42-year-old woman presented to the clinic for a 10-year history of intractable left upper extremity and forearm pain following a motor vehicle accident requiring skin grafting. Based on the patient's failure of more conservative therapy, a shared decision was made to pursue opioid sparing interventional modalities.
Pain Med Case Rep
September 2023
USC University Hospital: Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA.
Background: Peripheral nerve stimulators (PNS) are currently used for refractory cases of neuralgia, and are associated with single manufacturer use. This is the first case report describing the novel scenario where a patient received 2 neuromodulation devices from 2 different manufacturers.
Case Report: We present a 32-year-old woman with spinal muscle atrophy type 2 who received a permanent PNS implant for chronic neuralgia.
Epileptic Disord
September 2025
APHM, Timone Hospital, Epileptology and Cerebral Rhythmology, Marseille, France.
This case study reports the first documented use of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) to treat refractory status epilepticus (RSE). A 33-year-old woman with drug-resistant epilepsy and recurrent RSE underwent SEEG to define her epileptogenic zone. A new RSE started shortly before and continued during the SEEG exploration, being unresponsive to multiple antiseizure medications, vagal nerve stimulation, and corticosteroid therapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF