98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measure progression and quality of care. While legacy PROs such as the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) survey are well-validated, a lengthy PRO creates a time burden on patients, decreasing adherence. In recent years, PROs such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function and Pain Interference surveys were developed as computer adaptive tests, reducing time to completion. Previous studies have examined correlation between legacy PROs and PROMIS; however, no studies have developed effective prediction models utilizing PROMIS to create an IKDC index. While the IKDC is the standard knee PRO, computer adaptive PROs offer numerous practical advantages.
Purpose: To develop a nonlinear predictive model utilizing PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference to estimate IKDC survey scores and examine algorithm sensitivity and validity.
Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: The MOTION (Military Orthopaedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network) database is a prospectively collected repository of PROs and intraoperative variables. Patients undergoing knee surgery completed the IKDC and PROMIS surveys at varying time points. Nonlinear multivariable predictive models using Gaussian and beta distributions were created to establish an IKDC index score, which was then validated using leave-one-out techniques and minimal clinically important difference analysis.
Results: A total of 1011 patients completed the IKDC and PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference, providing 1618 complete observations. The algorithms for the Gaussian and beta distribution were validated to predict the IKDC (Pearson = 0.84-0.86; = 0.71-0.74; root mean square error = 9.3-10.0).
Conclusion: The publicly available predictive models can approximate the IKDC score. The results can be used to compare PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference against historical IKDC scores by creating an IKDC index score. Serial use of the IKDC index allows for a lower minimal clinically important difference than the conventional IKDC. PROMIS can be substituted to reduce patient burden, increase completion rates, and produce orthopaedic-specific survey analogs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465211041593 | DOI Listing |
Knee Surg Relat Res
September 2025
Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Gainesville, FL, 32607, USA.
Background: A clear understanding of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) is essential for effectively implementing patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) as a performance measure for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Since not achieving MCID and SCB may reflect suboptimal surgical benefit, the primary aim of this study was to use machine learning to predict patients who may not achieve the threshold-based outcomes (i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJB JS Open Access
September 2025
Center for Orthopaedic Injury Research and Innovation, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Background: Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly common in orthopaedic research yet routinely fail to detect clinically meaningful differences in clinical trials. We assessed if orthopaedic studies are more likely to detect clinically important differences with a binary outcome, such as nonunion surgery, or a continuous patient-reported outcome sensitive to important clinical differences.
Methods: We constructed a hypothetical clinical trial comparing 2 treatments for tibial shaft fractures.
N Am Spine Soc J
September 2025
Orthopedic Research Department, 31 Seymour St. Hartford HealthCare Bone and Joint Institute, Hartford, CT, 06106 United States.
Background: The reliance on patient reported outcomes (PROs) has substantially increased not only to augment current metrics of clinical success, but to capture the patient's perspective on the benefit of their treatment. As more PROs become utilized, the time and cost of longitudinal data collection and survey fatigue must be tempered with the benefit of the data collected. Therefore, this study sought to assess the responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) compared to the PROMIS-10 Global Health Survey physical function T-score (PFT) and mental health T-score (MHT).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurotrauma Rep
July 2025
Harvard Medical School, Football Players Health Study at Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Retrospective evaluations of repeated head injury are needed to better understand associations between head injury exposure and later-life deleterious outcomes. However, there is limited assessment of whether head injury recall assessments produce consistent measures over time, and no assessment of whether the reporting is related to current health status. The concussion signs and symptoms scale (CSS; developed for the Football Players Health Study at Harvard University) was designed to measure cumulative head injury exposure history by asking about the frequency of 10 CSS during active football play.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Geriatr Soc
September 2025
Frailty Research Center, Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Background: Prehabilitation may help older adults recover after surgery, yet adherence has been variable. We assessed the feasibility of a multi-component prehabilitation program.
Methods: This single-arm trial was conducted at an academic medical center to test the feasibility of an individualized prehabilitation program before major surgery.