A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing gamification with remote monitoring against standard rehabilitation for patients after arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Background: Gamification has become increasingly popular in rehabilitation and is viewed as a tool to improve patient activation, motivation, and engagement. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of validated exergames played through a system using "depth sensor" and bespoke software against standard physiotherapy in patients treated with arthroscopic shoulder surgery. This included the following common conditions: subacromial impingement syndrome, calcific tendinopathy, and rotator cuff tear.

Methods: Following arthroscopic shoulder surgery, patients were randomized into 1 of 2 groups: In the standard rehabilitation group, patients were followed up for 12 weeks after surgery with standard postoperative physiotherapy and underwent electronic measurements of their active range of movement (ROM). In the exergame group, patients followed a postoperative regimen of exergames using the principles of gamification with physiotherapy support. Patients were given an exergame schedule prescribed by their therapist on Medical Interactive Recovery Assistant (MIRA) software (MIRA Rehab, London, UK) paired with a Microsoft Kinect sensor (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). The primary outcome was active ROM objectively measured by MIRA and Kinect. Secondary outcome measures included the Oxford Shoulder Score, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and the EQ-VAS score at 12 weeks after surgery.

Results: A total of 71 patients were recruited to the study. We excluded 7 patients based on intraoperative findings. Thirty-three patients were treated with exergames, and 31 patients underwent conventional physiotherapy. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in baseline ROM. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in any of the cardinal planes of movement (forward flexion, P = .64; abduction, P = .33; and external rotation, P = .75). The mean Oxford Shoulder Score improved from 29.25 to 38.2 in the control group (P = .001) and from 27.1 to 35.1 in the trial group (P = .01); there was no significant difference between the groups at 12 weeks (P = .246). The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score improved from 38.13 to 16.98 in the control group (P = .001) and from 42.3 to 22.54 in the trial group (P = .007); there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .328). There was no significant difference in the EQ-VAS score in either group at any time point (P = .5866).

Conclusion: This randomized controlled trial demonstrates that exergames can be used effectively in the rehabilitation of patients following arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Outcomes, judged by ROM and patient-reported outcome measures, are equivalent to conventional physiotherapy rehabilitation protocols. This health care innovation has the potential to relieve some of the heavy burden placed on physiotherapy departments for "routine" postoperative care in shoulder surgery.