98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Results from the open-label extension of the phase 3b CONQUER trial are presented to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of galcanezumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide, for up to 6 months in patients with multiple prior migraine preventive treatment failures.
Methods: Patients were 18-75 years old with episodic or chronic migraine and 2-4 standard-of-care migraine preventive medication category failures. After 3 months of randomized treatment with galcanezumab (120 mg/month with 240 mg loading dose; n = 232) or placebo (n = 230), patients entered a 3-month open-label extension (120 mg/month galcanezumab with a blinded 240 mg loading dose for previous-placebo patients). Primary efficacy measure was mean change from double-blind baseline in monthly migraine headache days.
Results: A total of 432/449 patients (96%) who entered open-label treatment completed the study. Mean change in monthly migraine headache days in the total population, which was - 1.3 for placebo and - 4.4 for galcanezumab patients at the end of double-blind treatment (p < 0.001), was - 5.2 and - 5.6, respectively, at the end of open-label treatment with galcanezumab. Among patients with episodic migraine, mean change in monthly migraine headache days had been - 0.6 for placebo and - 2.8 for galcanezumab after double-blind treatment (p < 0.001) and was - 4.5 and - 3.8, respectively, after open-label treatment. Among patients with chronic migraine, mean change in monthly migraine headache days had been - 2.5 for placebo and - 6.6 for galcanezumab after double-blind treatment (p < 0.001) and was - 6.5 and - 8.2, respectively, after open-label treatment. Adverse events were similar to those observed during double-blind placebo treatment. Review of data in elderly patients (65-75 years of age) indicated that galcanezumab was well tolerated in this age group, with no safety issues identified.
Conclusions: Galcanezumab was effective and safe during open-label treatment in patients who had experienced failures of previous migraine preventives.
Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03559257.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523004 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01911-7 | DOI Listing |
Gastro Hep Adv
June 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology Section, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Background And Aims: Extraintestinal symptoms are well-documented in systemic, inflammation-predominant conditions. Less is understood about extragastrointestinal symptoms among individuals with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs). We aimed to describe the differences in the frequency of patient-reported joint or leg pain and headache for EoE and non-EoE EGIDs individuals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Neurol
September 2025
Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Background: Migraine is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk, including hypertension. Anti-calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are effective preventive treatments, but concerns have been raised about their potential hypertensive effects. Herein, we assess the early changes in blood pressure (BP) during anti-CGRP mAbs treatment in patients with migraine using 24-h Holter monitoring.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Med Res Opin
September 2025
AbbVie GK, Tokyo, Japan.
Objective: We evaluated real-world treatment patterns and unmet needs associated with migraine preventive medications in Japan following the introduction of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs), focusing on persistence, switching, and adherence rates.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed JMDC (previously Japan Medical Data Center) claims data (index date: April 2021 to January 2024) for treatment-naïve patients who initiated oral migraine preventive medications (OMPMs; = 12,750) and patients initiating CGRP mAbs ( = 3,280). Persistence was defined as continuous therapy without a 60-day or longer gap.
F1000Res
September 2025
Norwegian Centre for Headache Research (NorHead), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Introduction: Biofeedback is a non-pharmacological treatment option valued for its minimal risk of adverse events and offers a safe alternative for individuals seeking preventive care for migraine. Despite level A evidence for migraine prevention, biofeedback treatment is still unavailable to most patients. We developed a novel medical device (Cerebri) for multimodal biofeedback treatment that omits the need for healthcare personnel involvement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHypertension
September 2025
Braun School of Public Health, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. (R.C.-M.).
Background: An association between migraine and hypertension has long been suggested. However, previous studies yielded conflicting results, and only a few were conducted in adolescents. We aimed to investigate the association between migraine and hypertension in a large population-based study of adolescents.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF