[FOCAL TREATMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER - LEADING AND FUTURE TECHNIQUES, OUTCOMES AND COMPLICATIONS].

Harefuah

Urology Department, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.

Published: September 2021


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Focal treatment for prostate cancer has been proposed as an innovative strategy that aims to achieve oncological benefit while reducing treatment-related morbidity. This treatment is suitable for patients with low and intermediate risk, organ-confined disease. Focal therapy can be categorized as follows: unifocal index lesion ablation, multifocal ablation, hemi-gland ablation or subtotal gland ablation. Different types of energies are applied in focal therapy including high intensity focal ultrasound (HIFU), cryotherapy, focal laser ablation (FLA), irreversible electroporation (IRE) and Photodynamic therapy (PDT). In this review we will briefly present a summary of leading techniques and the available data regarding their oncological outcomes and adverse events. Whole-gland therapies were excluded from this review.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment prostate
8
prostate cancer
8
focal therapy
8
focal
5
ablation
5
[focal treatment
4
cancer leading
4
leading future
4
future techniques
4
techniques outcomes
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of an optimized online adaptive radiation therapy workflow on physician involvement.

Methods And Materials: Data from a prospective phase 2 trial involving 34 prostate cancer patients treated with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiation therapy (62 Gy in 20 fractions) were analyzed. Manual interventions were required for 2 steps in the workflow: radiation therapy technologist review and adjustment of automatically segmented organs, guiding target segmentation, so-called "influencer," while physicians reviewed and refined the targets.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To develop a novel risk score (RS) model to predict the probability of progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) (CRPC) after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with high- and very high-risk PCa according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk classification, since accurate prediction of the clinical outcome of definitive radiation therapy for patients with high- and very high-risk PCa remains challenging due to its heterogeneity.

Materials And Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 600 patients with high- and very high-risk PCa treated with IMRT at our institution. They were randomly divided into discovery (n = 300) and validation (n = 300) cohorts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Dose-driven continuous scanning (DDCS) enhances the efficiency and precision of proton pencil beam delivery by reducing beam pauses inherent in discrete spot scanning (DSS). However, current DDCS optimization studies using traveling salesman problem (TSP) formulations often rely on fixed beam intensity and computationally expensive interpolation for move spot generation, limiting efficiency and methodological robustness.

Purpose: This study introduces a Break Spot-Guided (BSG) method, combined with two acceleration strategies-dose rate skipping and bounding-to optimize beam intensity while minimizing beam delivery time (BDT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the only cancer in men to exhibit androgen sensitivity at diagnosis, which has allowed for the development of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, outcomes in high-risk PCa (HRPCa) remain significantly worse than low risk disease and the use of ADT varies among treatment algorithms and medical specialties. In men treated with radiation, testosterone recovery after completing ADT has been associated with oncologic outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patients And Methods: In this multicenter longitudinal study, data from the Spanish Register in AS (AEU-PIEM/2014/0001) were reviewed. The study focused on a cohort of AS patients registered between 2014 and 2019, featuring open inclusion criteria and diverse follow-up strategies.

Results: A total of 3315 AS patients were recruited, with 2881 and 434 categorized into the low and intermediate risk groups based on NCCN grouping at inclusion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF