98%
921
2 minutes
20
The omnigenic model was proposed as a framework to understand the highly polygenic architecture of complex traits revealed by genome-wide association studies (GWASs). I argue that this model also explains recent observations about cross-population genetic effects, specifically the low transferability of polygenic scores and the lack of clear evidence for polygenic selection. In particular, the omnigenic model explains why the effects of most GWAS variants vary between populations. This interpretation has several consequences for the evolutionary interpretation and practical use of GWAS summary statistics and polygenic scores. First, some polygenic scores may be applicable only in populations of the same ancestry and environment as the discovery population. Second, most GWAS associations will have differing effects between populations and are unlikely to be robust clinical targets. Finally, it may not always be possible to detect polygenic selection from population genetic data. These considerations make it difficult to interpret the clinical and evolutionary meanings of polygenic scores without an explicit model of genetic architecture.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456163 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.07.003 | DOI Listing |
J Alzheimers Dis
September 2025
Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Genetic risk prediction for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has high potential impact, yet few studies have assessed the reliability of various polygenic risk score (PRS) methods at the individual level. Here, we evaluated the reliability of AD PRS estimates among 6338 participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. We compared four PRS models that have been previously associated with dementia risk.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
September 2025
The University of Leicester Ulverscroft Eye Unit, School of Psychology and Vision Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Purpose: To define the genetic architecture of foveal morphology and explore its relevance to foveal hypoplasia (FH), a hallmark of developmental macular disorders.
Methods: We applied deep-learning algorithms to quantify foveal pit depth from central optical coherence tomography (OCT) B-scans in 61,269 UK Biobank participants. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted using REGENIE, adjusting for age, sex, height, and ancestry.
Int J Surg
September 2025
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Breast Cancer Res
September 2025
Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are not yet standard in clinical risk assessments for familial breast cancer in Sweden. This study evaluated the distribution and impact of an established PRS (PRS) in women undergoing clinical sequencing for hereditary breast cancer.
Findings: We integrated PRS into a hereditary breast cancer gene panel used in clinical practice and calculated scores for 262 women.
Mol Psychiatry
September 2025
Department of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
A family history of depression is a well-documented risk factor for offspring psychopathology. However, the genetic mechanisms underlying the intergenerational transmission of depression remain unclear. We used genetic, family history, and diagnostic data from 11,875 9-10 year-old children from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF