98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Over 1 million Americans undergo joint replacement each year, and approximately 1 in 75 will incur a periprosthetic joint infection. Effective treatment necessitates pathogen identification, yet standard-of-care cultures fail to detect organisms in 10% to 20% of cases and require invasive sampling. We hypothesized that cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments from microorganisms in a periprosthetic joint infection can be found in the bloodstream and utilized to accurately identify pathogens via next-generation sequencing.
Methods: In this prospective observational study performed at a musculoskeletal specialty hospital in the U.S., we enrolled 53 adults with validated hip or knee periprosthetic joint infections. Participants had peripheral blood drawn immediately prior to surgical treatment. Microbial cfDNA from plasma was sequenced and aligned to a genome database with >1,000 microbial species. Intraoperative tissue and synovial fluid cultures were performed per the standard of care. The primary outcome was accuracy in organism identification with use of blood cfDNA sequencing, as measured by agreement with tissue-culture results.
Results: Intraoperative and preoperative joint cultures identified an organism in 46 (87%) of 53 patients. Microbial cfDNA sequencing identified the joint pathogen in 35 cases, including 4 of 7 culture-negative cases (57%). Thus, as an adjunct to cultures, cfDNA sequencing increased pathogen detection from 87% to 94%. The median time to species identification for cases with genus-only culture results was 3 days less than standard-of-care methods. Circulating cfDNA sequencing in 14 cases detected additional microorganisms not grown in cultures. At postoperative encounters, cfDNA sequencing demonstrated no detection or reduced levels of the infectious pathogen.
Conclusions: Microbial cfDNA from pathogens causing local periprosthetic joint infections can be detected in peripheral blood. These circulating biomarkers can be sequenced from noninvasive venipuncture, providing a novel source for joint pathogen identification. Further development as an adjunct to tissue cultures holds promise to increase the number of cases with accurate pathogen identification and improve time-to-speciation. This test may also offer a novel method to monitor infection clearance during the treatment period.
Level Of Evidence: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.02229 | DOI Listing |
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
September 2025
Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Background: Differentiating periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) from aseptic failure is challenging in total joint arthroplasty. To date, there is no consensus about the most accurate criteria to diagnose PJI. The current study compares common diagnostic PJI criteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
September 2025
International Joint Center, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Despite undisputed success of orthopaedic procedures, surgical site infections (SSI) such as periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) continues to compromise the outcome and result in major clinical and economic burden. The overall rate of infection is expected to rise in the future resulting in significant associated mortality and morbidity. Traditional concepts have largely attributed the source of PJI to exogenous pathogens.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInfect Drug Resist
September 2025
School of Basic Medical Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, People's Republic of China.
Background: This study evaluated the applicability of histopathology, culture, and Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).
Methods: In this prospective trial, 215 consecutive patients with suspected knee PJI were enrolled. Tissue specimens were aseptically collected and processed for histopathological analysis, culture, and mNGS.
Orthopadie (Heidelb)
September 2025
Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Background: The DAIR procedure (debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention) represents a treatment option for acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Compared to revision arthroplasty, it is technically less invasive and, under appropriate indications, can preserve a well-fixed endoprosthesis. However, treatment success depends on numerous patient-, pathogen-, and procedure-related factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMusculoskelet Surg
September 2025
Chief of Dipartimento Osteoarticolare, AUSL della Romagna, Ravenna, Italy.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) is a preferred surgical technique due to its benefits, including reduced soft tissue disruption and faster recovery. However, obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m, poses unique challenges in DAA-THA, increasing the risk of complications and technical difficulties. This systematic review aims to assess the clinical and functional outcomes, complication rates, and reoperation rates in obese patients undergoing DAA-THA compared to non-obese patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF