98%
921
2 minutes
20
: Leukocyte esterase (LE) and α-defensin (AD) are two synovial biomarkers that are used for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), however, the superiority of one over the other remains unknown. We aimed to compare their diagnostic value.: In this retrospective study, we evaluated patients who underwent revision total hip and knee arthroplasty at a single institution between 2013 and 2019 for whom both LE and AD were available. PJI was defined by the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria. The diagnostic performance of AD and LE was compared.: Overall, 122 patients (28 PJI and 94 aseptic revisions) were included. The area under the curve was 0.905 (95% confidence interval[CI]:0.820-0.991) and 0.913 [95%CI:0.834-0.992] for LE and AD, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 95.8% (95%CI:76.5%-99.4%) and 94.9% (95%CI:89.4%-97.6%) for LE and 89.0% (95%CI:72.2%-96.1%) and 96.0% (95%CI:90.5%-98.3%) for AD. While both tests were useful in 18 cases that were inconclusive based on preoperative findings, AD had no benefit over LE.: Both LE and AD are valuable markers in patients with suspected PJI. Since LE is very inexpensive and readily available point-of-care test, we believe it offers more value in the wo up of suspected PJI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2021.1943364 | DOI Listing |
Clin Microbiol Infect
September 2025
Institute for Primary Health Care Research Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense-Aabenraa, Denmark; Stu
Background: Urine dipsticks are commonly used for the diagnosis of bacteriuria and/or urinary tract infections (UTIs).
Objectives: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of positive leukocyte esterase and/or nitrite results from dipsticks (index test) for diagnosing bacteriuria in older individuals, using urine culture as the reference standard.
Data Sources: MEDLINE (Pubmed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from the inception date up to April 2025.
Clin Chem Lab Med
September 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Objectives: Our previous study revealed a correlation between fecal leukocyte esterase and fecal calprotectin levels. This study assessed the predictive value of fecal leukocyte esterase compared with fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein of inflammatory bowel disease.
Methods: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease who underwent ileocolonoscopy at National Taiwan University Hospital from March 2022 to March 2024 were included.
Ann Med
December 2025
Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Background: Positive urine cultures are common in urinary stone patients, yet tools for early infection prediction are limited. To address this gap, a user-friendly, dynamic online nomogram was developed to predict the incidence of positive urine cultures in patients with urolithiasis.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 3,641 patients with urinary stones at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University.
Clin Chem
August 2025
Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infections encountered in healthcare settings. Current diagnostic practices often require 24-48 h due to the time needed for culture results. Given that 70%-80% of cultures return negative, there is significant interest in rapidly identifying negative samples to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Appl Lab Med
August 2025
Department of Medical Biology, CHR Haute Senne, Soignies, Belgium.
Background: Urine sediment analysis is a cornerstone of diagnostic testing. This study evaluates FUS-3000 Plus, an automated urine sediment analyzer using advanced imaging and artificial intelligence, to assess its technical performance and diagnostic accuracy for routine clinical use.
Methods: The study analyzed 98 urine samples for chemical parameters (pH, protein, blood, leukocyte esterase, and nitrite) and 76 samples for particle analysis (red blood cells [RBCs], white blood cells, epithelial cells, crystals, bacteria) by both FUS-3000 Plus and sediMAX™, the current laboratory analyzer in use.