Impact of the 2016 Election on the Quality of Life of Sexual and Gender Minority Adults: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.

LGBT Health

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Published: October 2021


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The 2016 U.S. election significantly changed the political landscape for sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals. The current study assessed the consequences of the election and transition to a new overtly discriminatory administration on the health-related quality of life of SGM adults compared with their cisgender and heterosexual counterparts. The study used repeated cross-sectional data from the 17 states that administered the sexual orientation and gender identity module in the 2015 and 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. The sample included 268,851 adult respondents: 12,006 SGM adults (5.35%) and 256,845 cisgender and heterosexual adults (94.65%). Outcomes were frequent (≥14 days in the last month) physical distress, mental distress, limited activity, and/or fair/poor general health. Difference-in-differences estimates were calculated from logistic regression models, controlling for sociodemographic, health care coverage, and chronic medical condition confounders. Compared with the cisgender and heterosexual population, frequent mental distress among SGM adults increased by 5% points, corresponding to a relative increase of 32.5% ( < 0.001) from 2015. Rates of frequent physical distress, limited activity, and fair/poor general health were not significantly altered between the two populations. Gender minority adults were most negatively affected with a relative increase in frequent mental distress of 117.5% ( < 0.001). The 2016 U.S. election and administration changeover were associated with a substantial increase in the proportion of SGM adults reporting frequent mental distress. These data provide empirical evidence as to the psychological effects of an abrupt political realignment on SGM mental health.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403205PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2020.0334DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sgm adults
12
cisgender heterosexual
12
2016 election
8
quality life
8
sexual gender
8
gender minority
8
compared cisgender
8
mental distress
8
adults
5
impact 2016
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: Understanding how place of residence affects cancer-related health risks is paramount to addressing health disparities in sexual and gender minority (SGM) cancer survivors. This study examined the associations between urbanicity and other social drivers of health on current tobacco and alcohol use in SGM cancer survivors.

Methods: The OUT: National Cancer Survey Study was a cross-sectional, online survey created by the National LGBT Cancer Network (NLCN) from September 2020 to March 2021, targeting U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer (LGBTQ+) legislation has dramatically increased in the United States. These laws limit the rights of sexual and gender minoritized (SGM) youth, but their health effects remain understudied. We estimated how a hypothetical intervention setting states to have more equitable LGBTQ+-related policies would affect individual-level pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among SGM youth and young adults, and whether internalized stigma mediates this effect.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Black, Latine, and Caribbean (BLC) sexual and gender minorities (SGM) face structural HIV inequities. Sociocentric interventions may address these barriers, but it is unclear if respondent-driven sampling (RDS) can recruit existing BLC SGM friendship groups or if sociocentric HIV prevention interventions are feasible.

Methods: Using an exploratory mixed-methods design (August/2022-January/2024, New York, NY), we recruited participants into a sociocentric RDS group (sRDS) or an individual-level peer referral (PR) group, with qualitative interviews drawn from quantitative participants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How do we know whether psychological science generalises across groups? External validity, including the nomological network, is key for establishing the utility of psychological constructs in under-investigated populations. We used an online, monthly longitudinal study measuring personality, social relationships and mental health. Among participants (total N = 1777; 31% retention), 73% identified as sexual and/or gender minority (SGM).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intimate partner violence (IPV), including physical violence, psychological aggression, and coercive control, is highly prevalent among sexual and gender minority young adults assigned female at birth (SGM-AFAB). However, we know little about the contexts in which IPV occurs (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF