Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Thirty-five previous meta-analyses have been reported on the individual glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) present/null, glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) present/null, and glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) IIe105Val polymorphisms with lung cancer (LC) risk. However, they did not appraise the credibility and explore the combined effects between the 3 genes and LC risk.We performed a meta-analysis and re-analysis of systematic previous meta-analyses to solve the above problems.Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were used. Moreover, we employed false-positive report probability (FPRP), Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP), and the Venice criteria to verify the credibility of current and previous meta-analyses.Significantly increased LC risk was considered as "highly credible" or "positive" for GSTM1 null genotype in Japanese (odds ratio (OR) = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.17-1.44, I2 = 0.0%, statistical power = 0.997, FPRP = 0.008, BFDP = 0.037, and Venice criteria: AAB), for GSTT1 null genotype in Asians (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.12-1.36, I2 = 49.1%, statistical power = 1.000, FPRP = 0.051, BFDP = 0.771, and Venice criteria: ABB), especially Chinese populations (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.16-1.49, I2 = 48.9%, Statistical power = 0.980, FPRP = 0.039, BFDP = 0.673, and Venice criteria: ABB), and for GSTP1 IIe105Val polymorphism in Asians (Val vs IIe: OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.17-1.42, I2 = 30.3%, statistical power = 0.999, FPRP = 0.003, BFDP = 0.183, and Venice criteria: ABB). Significantly increased lung adenocarcinoma (AC) risk was also considered as "highly credible" or "positive" in Asians for the GSTM1 (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.22-1.48, I2 = 25.5%, statistical power = 0.988, FPRP < 0.001, BFDP < 0.001, and Venice criteria: ABB) and GSTT1 (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.17-1.58, I2 = 30.2%, statistical power = 0.900, FPRP = 0.061, BFDP = 0.727, and Venice criteria: ABB) null genotype.This study indicates that GSTM1 null genotype is associated with increased LC risk in Japanese and lung AC risk in Asians; GSTT1 null genotype is associated with increased LC risk in Chinese, and GSTP1 IIe105Val polymorphism is associated with increased LC risk in Asians.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257913PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026104DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

venice criteria
20
glutathione s-transferase
12
criteria abb
12
combined effects
8
polymorphisms lung
8
lung cancer
8
cancer risk
8
meta-analysis re-analysis
8
re-analysis systematic
8
previous meta-analyses
8

Similar Publications

Asbestos bodies and amphibole fibres in the lung: do the Helsinki criteria need an update?

Ann Work Expo Health

August 2025

Occupational Health Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Background: Since the 1980s, lung fibre burden analysis has been used in reconstructing past exposure to asbestos and in estimating the dose-response relationship for asbestos-related cancers.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity (sensitivity and specificity) of the reference values proposed by the Helsinki Consensus Documents in 1997 and 2014 to assign asbestos exposure.

Methods: Counts of asbestos bodies (AB) and amphibole asbestos fibres (AAF) in dry lung tissue samples performed by the ARPA Electron Microscopy Laboratory in Milan from 2009 to 2020 have been used to assess the discriminating performance between asbestos exposure and background exposure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Training frequently induces electrocardiographic (ECG) changes that mimic heart diseases, requiring specific criteria for interpretation. Pediatric athletes represent a unique population as training-induced changes and those due to sexual maturation interact and specific criteria may be needed. We aimed to assess the prevalence and its relation to training of ECG abnormalities in young athletes aged 8-18 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Alternative Arterial Access in Veno-Arterial ECMO: The Role of the Axillary Artery.

J Clin Med

August 2025

Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) is increasingly used to support patients with refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. While femoral artery cannulation remains the most common arterial access, axillary artery cannulation has emerged as a valuable alternative in selected cases. : This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence and expert opinion on axillary artery cannulation in V-A ECMO, focusing on its technical feasibility, physiologic implications, and clinical outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Target mismatch criteria in acute ischemic stroke patients with distal-medium vessel occlusion.

Eur Stroke J

August 2025

Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Introduction: The efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) in ischemic stroke patients with distal-medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) remains unclear. We evaluated whether CT-perfusion target mismatch criteria (TMC) could predict functional independence in patients with M2 non- or codominant middle cerebral artery DMVO.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study analyzed consecutive patients with M2 DMVO receiving EVT and imaged with multimodal CT study protocol within 24 h from onset.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We systematically reappraised meta-analyses of pharmacogenetic studies to evaluate the credibility of association between gene polymorphisms and resistance to anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library and OpenGrey up to April 2025. The methodological quality of the included systematic meta-analyses was evaluated with the AMSTAR-2 tool, and the credibility of the genetic comparison results was determined by the Venice criteria and two Bayesian analytic approaches, false positive reporting probability (FPRP), and Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF