Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) alone versus DVI with adjunctive sweeping of membranes (ASM) for induction of labor (IOL).

Methods: Single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial; women with singleton term pregnancies, cervical dilation ≥1 and <3 cm, intact membranes allocated to either DVI or DVI with ASM. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 h of insertion. Secondary outcomes included mean time from insertion to delivery, tachysystole, operative delivery for non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS), tocolytics, fetal outcomes, pain information, and subject satisfaction.

Results: One hundred and four received DVI (Group 1) alone and 104 DVI with ASM (Group 2). The rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h was 53% versus 56%, cesarean rate 8.7% versus 10.6% in Groups 1 and 2 respectively. Although the duration of labor was similar in both groups, about 6% of women required additional ripening with dinoprostone vaginal tablets in Group 2 compared to 11.5% in Group 1 (p-value = 0.2). The frequency of hyperstimulation syndrome, failed induction, analgesic requirements, and fetal outcomes were comparable. The majority (83%-86%) in either cohort were satisfied with their labor experience. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated a slightly better chance for vaginal delivery within 24 h (odds ratio [OR] 1.22 [95% confidence interval, CI 0.65-2.29]; p-value 0.53] for DVI with ASM, although statistically insignificant. Younger maternal age and multiparity (OR 10.36 [95% CI 4.88-23.67]; p-value <0.0001) contributed to successful IOL.

Conclusion: DVI with ASM is at least as efficacious as DVI for cervical ripening with no increase in morbidity. Although DVI with ASM group less often needed additional dinoprostone tablets to complete the process of IOL (p-value = 0.2), adjunctive sweeping has not been shown to have a significant impact on the duration of labor or mode of delivery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453915PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14907DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dinoprostone vaginal
8
vaginal insert
8
insert dvi
8
dvi versus
8
adjunctive sweeping
8
sweeping membranes
8
induction labor
8
dvi
4
versus adjunctive
4
membranes dvi
4

Similar Publications

Does a second cervical ripening procedure improve vaginal delivery outcomes in primiparous women with an unfavourable Cervix? A before-and-after French study.

J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod

August 2025

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rouen University Hospital, France; Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1153, Obstetric, Perinatal, Paediatric Life Course Epidemiology (OPPaLE) Research Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Paris, France. Electronic address: sophia.b

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a second cervical ripening procedure in primiparous women with an unfavourable persistent cervix.

Methods: This retrospective, before-and-after, comparative study was conducted at Rouen University Hospital, France between January 1st, 2018, and August 15th, 2022. Inclusion criteria were women with indications for labour induction with singleton term pregnancies in cephalic presentation and with a Bishop score <6 who required an initial cervical ripening.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Labor induction is a common obstetric intervention, and the Bishop score remains a widely used clinical tool for predicting its success by assessing cervical readiness. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from 36 studies published between 2013 and 2025 across diverse populations to evaluate the predictive value of the Bishop score for successful vaginal delivery following labor induction. The analysis highlights that a Bishop score below 6 typically necessitates cervical ripening with pharmacologic and mechanical methods demonstrating variable efficacy based on initial cervical conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Timing of Prostin E2 Administration After Poor Response to Propess: Impact on Induction-to-Birth Interval and Maternal/Neonatal Outcomes.

Medicina (Kaunas)

July 2025

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan.

For many patients, the induction-to-delivery interval is shorter with Propess than with Prostin E2. However, some patients also require Prostin E2 to sufficiently boost their dinoprostone levels to achieve cervical change and vaginal delivery. In this study, we compared the efficacy of different timings of Prostin E2 administration after Propess use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Localized provoked vulvodynia (LPV) is characterized by chronic vulvar pain upon light touch to the vestibule, a specialized ring of tissue immediately surrounding the vaginal opening. LPV affects about 14 million people in the US, yet the etiopathology of the disease is unknown. In LPV, the vestibule expresses elevated levels of the pro-nociceptive pro-inflammatory mediators prostaglandin E (PGE2) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), which corresponds to lower pain thresholds.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF