98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Therapeutic misconception (TM) refers to research subjects' failure to distinguish the goals of clinical research from standard personal care. TM has traditionally been determined by questioning the patient about the research study's purpose. Recent research, however, has questioned whether TM is as prevalent as reported due to discrepancies between patient/researcher interpretations of TM questions. The authors have created an interview tool receptive to these advancements to more accurately determine the prevalence of TM.
Methods: Patients were questioned about the trial's purpose as follows: 1) "Is the trial mostly intending to help research and gain knowledge?," 2) "Is it mostly intending to help you as a person?," or 3) "Don't know." Participants were then asked what they thought this question was asking: A) "What my own intentions are for participating," B) "What the official purpose of the research study is," or C) "Not sure." A patient exhibited TM by answering that the official trial purpose was to help him or her.
Results: Patients (n = 98) had a mean age of 60 years, were mostly White (64%), had a combined family annual income ≥$60,000 (61%), and 49% had a college degree. Twelve of 98 patients (12%) definitely exhibited TM. This was much lower than the author's original finding of 68% in a similar cohort. Twenty-four of 98 patients (24.5%) were unclear about what one or both questions were asking and could not be categorized.
Conclusions: Previously, a patient was thought to have TM if they answered that the purpose of the trial was to benefit to him or her. An additional query about how patients interpreted that question revealed only 12% definitely had TM.
Lay Summary: Therapeutic misconception (TM) refers to research subjects' failure to distinguish the goals of clinical research from standard personal care. TM signals a basic misunderstanding of the purpose of clinical research, threatening valid informed consent to participate in clinical trials. TM has traditionally been determined by questioning patients about their research study's purpose. Recent research, however, has questioned whether TM is as prevalent due to discrepancies between patient/researcher interpretations of TM questions. By developing an interview-tool receptive to these advancements, we report a lower TM estimate in the phase 1 setting (12%) than we found previously in a similar cohort (68%).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33746 | DOI Listing |
HSS J
August 2025
Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.
The possibility of modifying disease through regenerative medicine applications, particularly stem cell therapies, raises ethical and regulatory challenges in orthopedics. This review article provides historical context of stem cell research, ethical issues such as informed consent, therapeutic misconception, and equitable access, emphasizing the responsibilities of providers offering investigational treatments. It also examines the evolving role of the U.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeuroethics
July 2025
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.
Introduction: New, highly portable MRI (pMRI) technology promises to revolutionize brain research by facilitating field-based studies that can expand research to new settings beyond the traditional MRI suite in a medical center. At this early stage of development, understanding public knowledge and attitudes about pMRI research is crucial.
Objective: In this article we present the first empirical study of the general public's willingness to participate in pMRI research, and their perceptions of expected benefits and concerns.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
August 2025
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Medical Center Temple, 2401 S 31St Street, Temple, TX 76508 USA.
Managing adult patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) presents unique diagnostic as well as therapeutic challenges due to their altered anatomy, complex physiology, and lack of surgical records. We present a case of pseudo-paravalvular leakage after mitral valve (MV) replacement. The patient was a 46-year-old female who presented with severe mitral regurgitation, pulmonary hypertension, and single-vessel coronary artery disease.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNat Rev Cardiol
July 2025
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
A misconception persisting among the scientific and clinical communities relates to the correlation between arterial stenosis and acute ischaemic events, including myocardial infarction and cerebral stroke. This Perspective article challenges the approach that most of the current guidelines codify, which is based on the concept that occlusive arterial stenosis generally provokes ischaemic events. We highlight the mechanistic differences between chronic or inducible ischaemia caused by flow-limiting stenoses and acute thrombotic events and question the traditional reliance on stenosis grading as a biomarker for therapeutic decision-making that many guidelines enshrine.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Ethics
July 2025
University Hospital Centre of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Background: Therapeutic misconception (TM) among research participants refers to the conflation of research goals (generating generalisable knowledge) with clinical care goals (making the best decisions for the participants). Considering the high volume of oncology research, oncologists frequently encounter TM.
Aim: To evaluate the knowledge, practices, and ethical concerns of French oncologists regarding TM.