Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Mastectomy and immediate reconstruction may be challenging in patients with large breasts, especially when significant ptosis is also present. Skin-reducing mastectomy (SRM) is usually indicated in these cases, although with increased morbidity. The aims of the study were to introduce 2 modifications of the classic technique and to incorporate them in the management algorithm to improve the outcomes.Twenty patients fulfilling the criteria for SRM underwent mastectomy and reconstruction either with the "classic SRM" (8 patients) or with 1 of the 2 modifications described here: modification A "vertical limb bridging" (for patients with very large breasts, 2 patients) and modification B "dual coverage" (for patients with moderate breasts, 10 patients). All reconstructions were performed using a slow progressive expansion of the implant. Herein, we describe the techniques along with the proposed indications for each one of them.There was no reconstruction failure, and all patients were satisfied with the final results. There were 2 cases with T junction, lateral skin flap partial ischemia managed with delayed revision of the wound on the fifth postoperative day to allow less skin excision. One patient (smoker) developed severe lower pole cellulitis, which was managed conservatively. Finally, 1 patient who underwent radiotherapy developed a late infected seroma, which was managed successfully with drainage and antibiotics. Overall, there was good lower pole projection even with the dual-coverage modification.Skin-reducing mastectomy can be tailored according to individual patient anatomy, and the high reported complication rate associated with this technique can be minimized using certain surgical modifications, tissue expanders with progressive inflation, and good patient selection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002768DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mastectomy reconstruction
8
patients
8
patients large
8
large breasts
8
breasts patients
8
lower pole
8
de-epithelialized skin
4
skin flaps
4
flaps minimize
4
minimize complications
4

Similar Publications

We present the case of a 45-year-old Caucasian woman diagnosed with synchronous bicentric breast cancer of differing molecular phenotypes in the same breast. The first tumor, an invasive ductal carcinoma (G1), was estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive and HER2-negative, with a low proliferative index (Ki67 10%). A second lesion, located in a different quadrant and appearing within weeks after biopsy, exhibited a triple-negative phenotype and a higher proliferative index (Ki67 30%).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This narrative review examines gender-affirming healthcare in the Nordic countries, highlighting historical developments, legal frameworks, epidemiological trends, and current clinical practices. Transgender healthcare dates back to the early 20th century and gained international attention in the early 1950s following one of the first widely publicized gender-affirming surgeries performed in Denmark. Since then, care models have evolved, supported by policy, research, and clinical practice across Europe and North America.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patient electronic communication (PEC) via secure messaging is important for patient engagement. While PEC has been studied in primary care, data on surgical specialties, particularly plastic surgery, remain limited.

Objectives: This study assessed the volume and content of post-discharge PECs among patients undergoing post-mastectomy autologous breast reconstruction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Total mastectomy for breast cancer is an impactful procedure, and breast reconstruction plays a crucial role for women diagnosed with the disease.

Objectives: The objective of our study is to compare satisfaction, morbidity, and timelines of two breast reconstruction techniques after breast cancer: breast prosthesis and exclusive lipofilling.

Methods: This is a comparative, retrospective, unicentric study on patients who underwent total mastectomy between May 2014 and May 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF