98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: Clinical evidence demonstrating risk factors for anastomotic leakage including robotic staplers has remained limited, even though the use of robotic surgery has increased substantially. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of robotic staplers on symptomatic anastomotic leakage in robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Methods: A total of 427 consecutive patients with primary rectal cancer who underwent robotic low anterior resection without diverting stoma were investigated retrospectively. Symptomatic anastomotic leakage was defined as anastomotic leakage of Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ II. We compared the symptomatic anastomotic leakage rates between manual and robotic staplers using propensity score matching and investigated the risk factors for symptomatic anastomotic leakage.
Results: After propensity score matching, 168 pairs of manual and robotic stapler cases were selected. The symptomatic anastomotic leakage rate was significantly higher for manual staplers (6.5%) than for robotic staplers (1.2%, p = 0.02). In a multivariate analysis, the use of a manual stapler (p = 0.04, OR 4.86, 95% CI 1.08-21.8) and anastomosis < 4 cm from the anal verge (p < 0.01, OR 4.36, 95% CI 1.48-12.9) were identified as independent risk factors for symptomatic anastomotic leakage.
Conclusions: Robotic stapler use was associated with a significantly decreased rate of anastomotic leakage in robotic low anterior resection without diverting stoma for rectal cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02313-6 | DOI Listing |
Surg Endosc
September 2025
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background: Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has been established as a safe and effective treatment for anastomotic leakage. While rare, major aortic hemorrhage has been reported as a severe complication potentially associated with EVT. However, significant hemorrhages have also been observed in patients with transmural defects in the upper gastrointestinal tract, without the use of EVT.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Coll Surg
September 2025
Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Background: Rural populations experience higher colon cancer (CC) mortality than urban populations, and rural patients may have more complications following resection. Reoperations due to complications following CC resection among rural and urban patients are not clear, and factors mediating disparities in rural-urban postoperative outcomes have not been examined.
Study Design: Using the SEER-Medicare database, individuals with CC who underwent surgical resection were compared via multivariable logistic regression to determine the association of rurality with postoperative complications and reoperations at 30, 60, and 90 days.
Int J Colorectal Dis
September 2025
Internal Medicine Department, Mirwais Regional Hospital, Kandahar, Afghanistan.
Background: The primary treatment for colorectal cancer, which is very prevalent, is surgery. Anastomotic leaking poses a significant risk following surgery. Intestinal perfusion can be objectively and instantly assessed with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging, which may lower leakage rates and enhance surgical results.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatr Surg Int
September 2025
Pediatric Surgery Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia.
Purpose: This meta-analysis compares thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF).
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to April 2025 for studies comparing thoracoscopic versus conventional thoracotomy approaches. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using appropriate tools.
Langenbecks Arch Surg
September 2025
Department of Surgery (A), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Introduction: Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) which consists of repeated brief episodes of non-lethal limb ischaemia is associated with organ protection and improved clinical outcomes through complex pathophysiological pathways. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the postoperative effects of RIPC in bowel recovery and surgical morbidity after colorectal surgery.
Methods: In strict adherence to the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was performed for studies comparing the postoperative effect RIPC in colorectal surgery.