98%
921
2 minutes
20
The present study identified subgroups based on inhibitory and reward activation, two key neural functions involved in risk-taking behavior, and then tested the extent to which subgroup differences varied by age, sex, behavioral and familial risk, and substance use. Participants were 145 young adults (18-21 years old; 40.0% female) from the Michigan Longitudinal Study. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to establish subgroups using task-based brain activations. Demographic and substance use differences between subgroups were then examined in logistic regression analyses. Whole-brain task activations during a functional magnetic resonance imaging go/no-go task and monetary incentive delay task were used to identify beta weights as input for LPA modeling. A four-class model showed the best fit with the data. Subgroups were categorized as: (1) low inhibitory activation/moderate reward activation (39.7%), (2) moderate inhibitory activation/low reward activation (22.7%), (3) moderate inhibitory activation/high reward activation (25.2%), and (4) high inhibitory activation/high reward activation (12.4%). Compared with the other subgroups, Class 2 was older, less likely to have parental alcohol use disorder, and had less alcohol use. Class 4 was the youngest and had greater marijuana use. Classes 1 and 3 did not differ significantly from the other subgroups. These findings demonstrate that LPA applied to brain activations can be used to identify distinct neural profiles that may explain heterogeneity in substance use outcomes and may inform more targeted substance use prevention and intervention efforts.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036797 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-021-00907-8 | DOI Listing |
JAACAP Open
September 2025
Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Objective: To assess biological factors associated with anhedonia in depression and amotivation in cannabis use (PROSPERO: CRD42023422438).
Method: A systematic review was conducted of 8 electronic databases. Inclusion criteria included original research studies that investigated the association of biological factors or behavioral tasks with depression combined with concepts of anhedonia or cannabis combined with concepts of amotivation including apathy.
Brain Behav
September 2025
Centre For Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University of London, London, UK.
Introduction: There is an ongoing debate about the neural mechanisms and subjective preferences involved in the processing of social rewards compared to non-social reward types.
Methods: Using whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined brain activation patterns during the anticipation and consumption phases of monetary and social rewards (using the Monetary and Social Incentive Delay Task-MSIDT, featuring human avatars) and their associations with self-reported social reward preferences measured by the Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ) in 20 healthy right-handed individuals.
Results: In the anticipation phase, all reward types activated the dorsal striatum, middle cingulo-insular (salience) network, inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and supplementary motor areas.
Neurosci Res
September 2025
Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto prefecture, Japan. Electronic address:
Decision-making often involves evaluating trade-offs between potential rewards and aversive outcomes, engaging both motivational drive and affective judgment. The ventral striatum (VS) and ventral pallidum (VP) are key regions in these processes. While the VS is associated with reward processing and incentive motivation, the VP encodes hedonic value and mediates motivated behaviors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJMIR Form Res
September 2025
Department of Psychological Science, School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, 4201 Social and Behavioral Sciences Gateway, Irvine, CA, 92697, United States, 1 203-887-8857.
Background: Rates of loneliness have risen sharply since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, largely due to disruptions in social relationships and daily routines, with college students experiencing some of the greatest increases. While prevention programs targeting loneliness have been developed, their success has been limited. One promising approach may lie in enhancing the quality of existing relationships rather than simply increasing social interactions during periods of acute loneliness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
September 2025
Behavioral Neuroscience Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD 21224.
Learning when to initiate or withhold actions is essential for survival, requiring the integration of past experiences with new information to adapt to changing environments. The prelimbic cortex (PL) plays a central role in this process, with a stable PL neuronal population (ensemble) recruited during operant reward learning to encode response execution. However, it is unknown how this established reward-learning ensemble adapts to changing reward contingencies, such as reward omission during extinction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF