98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic total gastrectomy without mesentery division (LTG without MD) and conventional total laparoscopic total gastrectomy (CLTG), as well as evaluate the appropriate method for esophagojejunostomy (EJ) reconstruction after total laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG).
Materials And Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 301 consecutive patients who underwent TLTG for upper or middle third gastric cancer between January 2016 and May 2019. After propensity score matching, 95 patients who underwent LTG without MD and 95 who underwent CLTG were assessed. Data on clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes, including operation time, length of postoperative hospital stay, pathological findings, and postoperative complications were analyzed.
Results: The LTG without MD group showed a shorter time to first flatus (3.26±0.80 vs. 3.62±0.81 days, P=0.003) and a shorter time to soft diet (2.80±2.09 vs. 3.52±2.20 days, P=0.002). The total EJ-related complications in the LTG without MD group were comparable to those in the CLTG group (9.47% vs. 3.16%, P=0.083). EJ-related leakage (6.32% vs. 3.16%, P=0.317) and EJ-related stricture (3.16% vs. 1.05%, P=0.317) rates were not significantly different between the LTG without MD and CLTG groups. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of other early surgical outcomes such as early complications, late complications, hospital stay, and readmission rate.
Conclusions: LTG without MD is a safe surgical treatment for upper or middle third gastric cancer. LTG without MD may be an alternative procedure for EJ anastomosis during TLTG.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8019998 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e7 | DOI Listing |
Hernia
September 2025
Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, Herlev, DK-2730, Denmark.
Purpose: Primary ventral hernia repair is a common elective procedure; however, mesh placement practices vary widely, and there is limited evidence to guide optimal placement. This international study examined surgeons' preferences and considerations regarding mesh placement in elective primary ventral hernia repair.
Methods: We conducted an international cross-sectional survey targeting surgeons experienced in primary ventral hernia repair.
JTCVS Open
August 2025
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Objectives: Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia (LGPEHR) is a complex operation and typically includes an antireflux procedure (ARS); however, some patients without a history of reflux may be able to avoid an ARS. The objective of this study was to evaluate an alternative approach for giant paraesophageal hernia (GPEH) repair with restoration of the normal anatomy and an extended gastropexy in selected patients with minimal reflux symptoms.
Methods: Patients who underwent GPEH repair with an extended gastropexy were reviewed retrospectively.
Aim: This study explores the evolving landscape of gastrectomy procedures in Japan, based on nationwide surveys conducted in 2014 and 2021. It highlights changes in surgical approaches, including a growing focus on minimally invasive and function-preserving procedures, as well as the increasing consideration of postoperative quality of life (QOL).
Methods: Two nationwide questionnaire surveys were conducted in 2014 and 2021, targeting members of the Japanese Society for Gastro-surgical Pathophysiology.
Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the use of spray-type anti-adhesion material during diverting ileostomy construction could reduce the surgeon's multidimensional workload, the degree of adhesion, and the operation time in ileostomy closure.
Methods: Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer, who were scheduled for laparoscopic or robotic rectal surgery followed by diverting ileostomy, were single-blindly (patient-blind), randomly assigned to either the AdSpray™ arm or the control arm. The primary endpoint was the multidimensional workload of the ileostomy closure operator (SURG-TLX value).
Cureus
August 2025
Investigation, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Ixtapaluca, Mexico City, MEX.
Splenic pseudocysts represent an uncommon condition in abdominal surgery, generally resulting from trauma, infection, or ischemic processes. Histologically, they are characterized by the absence of an epithelial lining; that is, they lack the inner layer of cells typically found in true cysts. Its clinical presentation is non-specific, commonly manifesting with abdominal pain, early satiety, or alterations in bowel habits, which lead to late or incidental diagnoses through imaging studies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF