98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: To investigate implementation of evidence-based and supportive cares in ICUs, such as the ABCDEF, nutrition therapy, and ICU diary, for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection in ICUs and their association with ICU clinical practice and setting.
Design: A worldwide, 2-day point prevalence study.
Setting: The study was carried out on June 3, 2020, and July 1, 2020. A total of 212 ICUs in 38 countries participated. Clinicians in each participating ICU completed web-based online surveys.
Patients: The ICU patients with coronavirus disease 2019.
Interventions: None.
Measurements And Main Results: The implementation rate for the elements of the ABCDEF bundle, other supportive ICU care measures, and implementation-associated structures were investigated. Data were collected for 262 patients, of whom 47.3% underwent mechanical ventilation and 4.6% were treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Each element was implemented for the following percentages of patients: elements A (regular pain assessment), 45%; B (both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials), 28%; C (regular sedation assessment), 52%; D (regular delirium assessment), 35%; E (early mobility and exercise), 47%; and F (family engagement and empowerment), 16%. The implementation of element E was 4% for patients on mechanical ventilation and 8% for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Supportive care, such as protein provision throughout the ICU stay (under 1.2 g/kg for more than 50% of the patients) and introduction of ICU diary (25%), was infrequent. Implementation rates of elements A and D were higher in ICUs with specific protocols and fewer ICU beds exclusively for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection. Element E was implemented at a higher rate in ICUs that had more ICU beds assigned for them.
Conclusions: This point prevalence study showed low implementation of the ABCDEF bundle. Specific protocols and the number of ICU beds reserved for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection might be key factors for delivering appropriate supportive care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994035 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000353 | DOI Listing |
The COVID-19 pandemic required healthcare organizations to rapidly upskill workers to care for critically ill patients. An integrative review focused on the upskilling of nurses during the pandemic identified themes of strategies, benefits, and challenges of rapid upskilling. Understanding the effectiveness, satisfaction, and challenges of upskilling efforts during COVID-19 can help healthcare organizations prepare for future emergencies by improving workforce readiness and response strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHealth Soc Care Deliv Res
September 2025
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Background: Remote services (in which the patient and staff member are not physically colocated) and digital services (in which a patient encounter is digitally mediated in some way) were introduced extensively when the COVID-19 pandemic began in 2020. We undertook a longitudinal qualitative study of the introduction, embedding, evolution and abandonment of remote and digital innovations in United Kingdom general practice. This synoptic paper summarises study design, methods, key findings, outputs and impacts to date.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
September 2025
Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has made long-standing nursing workforce challenges apparent on an international scale. Decision-makers must develop multi-pronged approaches to foster the development and maintenance of a strong nursing workforce to support health systems. These approaches require attendance to recruitment and retention initiatives that show promise for stabilising the nursing workforce now and into the future.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Emerg Med
August 2025
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hyogo Emergency Medical Center, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan.
Background: The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients who received extracorporeal pulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has not yet been fully elucidated. We examined whether there were differences in ECPR frequency and outcomes for OHCA patients who received ECPR during the pandemic.
Methods: Using the nationwide JAAM-OHCA registry, we evaluated OHCA patients who received ECPR from 2019 to 2022.
J Bras Nefrol
September 2025
Centro de Asistencia del Sindicato Médico del Uruguay (CASMU), Institución de Asistencia Médica Privada de Profesionales sin fines de lucro (IAMPP), Departamento de Nefrología, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Introduction: Acute kidney disease (AKD) is defined as functional and/or structural abnormalities of kidneys with health implications and a duration of ≤90 days. This study aimed to evaluate AKD as a more appropriate approach to these conditions for which we used a cohort of COVID-19 patients in whom kidney impairment is expressed by proteinuria and/or loss of function.
Methods: Observational, prospective, longitudinal, multinational cohort study conducted across five Latin American countries.