98%
921
2 minutes
20
Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) and firearms has typically focused on homicide, so there is limited information on how firearms are used in nonfatal ways, particularly in community samples. We sought to estimate the prevalence of nonfatal firearm abuse in the context of IPV, understand how and against whom firearms are used, and examine consequences of this abuse. Using a national web-based survey of US adults who experienced IPV (n = 958), we asked respondents about experiences with nonfatal firearm abuse, including the frequency of firearm behaviors and consequences. Based on screening data weighted to be nationally representative, we estimated that 9.8% (95% CI: 9.0%, 10.6%) of US adults - or nearly 25 million - have experienced nonfatal firearm abuse by an intimate partner (i.e., were threatened with a firearm, had a firearm used on them, or were threatened by a partner who possessed or had easy access to a firearm). IPV victims who experienced nonfatal firearm abuse commonly reported experiencing other forms of IPV. The most common behaviors included the partner displaying a firearm (67.5%) and threatening to shoot the victim (63.0%). The majority (80.5%) of perpetrators were male, and 49.2% of respondents had a child at home at the time of abuse. The most common consequences of nonfatal firearm abuse were concerns for safety (86.2%) and feeling fearful (82.7%). Additionally, 43.1% of respondents reported physical injury, and 37.4% missed days of work or school. Practice and policy around firearm access for IPV perpetrators should attend to nonfatal firearm use against intimate partners.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096701 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106500 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Psychiatry
August 2025
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Inj Epidemiol
August 2025
Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Background: Endemic levels of community firearm violence in United States cities disproportionately burden certain sociodemographic groups. Nonfatal injuries are an understudied aspect of firearm violence. Police data in a large and heterogenous place like New York City (NYC) provide the unique opportunity to use a single data source to measure fatal and nonfatal community firearm violence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatr Emerg Care
July 2025
Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Objectives: We aimed to describe pediatric firearm incidents treated at 6 New York City public trauma hospitals over a 5-year period.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional, descriptive study of firearm-related incidents among patients below 18 years treated at 6 municipal trauma centers in New York City from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2021. We used trauma registries, electronic health records (EHR), and geospatial analysis, supplemented with Gun Violence Archive (GVA) and New York Police Department data to characterize and map incidents, excluding missing data.
Inj Prev
July 2025
Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Objective: Veterans are disproportionately affected by firearm injury (FAI). Beyond the human toll of FAIs, they also strain healthcare systems. This study examined excess costs from FAIs incurred by the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System among a cohort of VA-using Veterans.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF