98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Budesonide-formoterol taken as needed is an emerging treatment for mild asthma.
Objective: We used data from the SYGMA studies to assess the safety of As-needed budesonide-formoterol compared with As-needed terbutaline and compared with maintenance budesonide.
Methods: SYGMA 1 and 2 were 52-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies in patients aged ≥ 12 years with physician-assessed mild asthma. Patients were randomized to As-needed budesonide-formoterol 200/6 μg, twice-daily budesonide 200 μg as maintenance plus As-needed terbutaline 0.5 mg, and As-needed terbutaline 0.5 mg (SYGMA 1 only). Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), discontinuations due to AEs (DAEs), and study-defined asthma-related discontinuations from corresponding treatment groups in both studies were pooled. SYGMA 1 data were used for comparisons with As-needed terbutaline alone.
Results: The pooled analysis included 3366 patients in the As-needed budesonide-formoterol group and 3369 in the budesonide maintenance group, with AEs in 40.8% and 42.5% of patients, respectively. Common AEs included viral upper respiratory tract infection (viral URTI) and URTI. SAE, DAE, and asthma-related discontinuation rates were similar with As-needed budesonide-formoterol and maintenance budesonide. Potential local and systemic corticosteroid class effects were reported in ≤ 1% of patients for each budesonide-containing regimen. In SYGMA 1, AEs were more common in the As-needed terbutaline (n = 1277) than As-needed budesonide-formoterol (n = 1277) groups (42.7 vs. 38.0%), as were DAEs (2.9 vs. 0.8%) and asthma-related discontinuations (1.6 vs. 0.3%).
Conclusions: Budesonide-formoterol anti-inflammatory reliever therapy is generally well-tolerated in patients with mild asthma and has a safety profile similar to that of daily budesonide. No new safety signals were identified. CLINICALTRIAL.
Gov Identifiers: NCT02149199 (SYGMA 1) and NCT02224157 (SYGMA 2).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994217 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-01041-z | DOI Listing |
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
July 2025
MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS@RISE-Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. Electronic address:
Background: The main types of commercially available inhalers for the management of asthma include dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). The environmental impact of pMDIs, due to hydrofluorocarbon propellants, is a growing concern.
Objective: To conduct a carbon-utility analysis in mild asthma, comparing the clinical efficacy of DPIs versus pMDIs alongside their associated environmental impacts.
J Asthma Allergy
April 2025
Respiratory Medicine Department, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Aim: Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist combinations are crucial for the effective treatment of asthma. ICS/formoterol regimens serve both as controller and reliever medications, as recommended by GINA 2019 onwards. In the six-month real-life NOTOS study, we aimed to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR) administered with the Elpenhaler device as controller and/or reliever medication on asthma control, quality of life, and lung function in patients with asthma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFZhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi
March 2025
Bronchial asthma (asthma) is a common chronic respiratory disease. Standardized diagnosis, treatment and effective clinical management are critical to improving asthma control, improving patients' quality of life, and reducing the disease burden. Based on the latest evidence-based research from both domestic and international references, the Asthma Group of the Chinese Thoracic Society has revised the " ()".
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPulm Ther
March 2025
GSK Pharmaceutical, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
Introduction: The MERIT study in Malaysia is a real-world retrospective, observational, multicenter study that evaluated asthma control in patients with uncontrolled asthma who were switched from as-needed (pro re nata [PRN]) budesonide/formoterol or inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) whenever a short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) was taken, to proactive regular dosing of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL PRD).
Methods: Data from the medical records of patients who were stepped up to FP/SAL PRD were extracted retrospectively at baseline and follow-up (between 3 and 6 months after stepping up to FP/SAL PRD). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with improvement in asthma control assessed via the Asthma Control Test (ACT).
J Med Econ
August 2024
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Economics Institute, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol reliever and maintenance therapy compared with salmeterol/fluticasone plus salbutamol as reliever therapy for asthma patients ≥12 years from the societal perspective in China.
Methods: A Markov model was developed with three health states (non-exacerbation, exacerbation, and death) with a lifetime horizon. The exacerbation rates were obtained from a prospective cohort study conducted in Chinese asthma patients.