Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: To inform policy making under the proposed , we compared annual costs of using e-cigarettes versus cigarettes, and estimated revenue from e-cigarette taxation.

Methods: We extracted e-cigarette retail prices from 231 South African e-cigarette vendor websites. We compared annual costs associated with daily cigarette smoking (self-reports from daily smokers in the 2018 South African Social Attitudes Survey, SASAS) versus daily e-cigarette use (based on cumulative costs of consumables plus device costs). We estimated revenue from excise tax if e-cigarettes were taxed at 75% (the rate proposed by the government) and 37.5% (half of the government's proposal as a hypothetical scenario) of the cigarette excise rate. We applied the different rates to e-cigarette consumption in 2018 SASAS and projected for 2021.

Results: Mean annual cost associated with daily use was ZAR 6693 (US$460.32, based on an exchange rate of about 69 US$ to 1000 ZAR) for manufactured cigarettes; for e-cigarettes, this ranged from ZAR 8574.69/year (with price minimizing strategies) to ZAR 19780.83/year (retail products exclusively). Expected revenue from e-cigarette excise tax at 75% of the cigarette tax rate was up to ZAR 2.20 billion (95% CI: 0.96-3.44). If taxed at 37.5% of the cigarette tax rate - half of the government's proposed rate - the projected revenue was up to ZAR 1.10 billion (95% CI: 0.48-1.72). Of the projected revenue from e-cigarette excise tax at 75% of the cigarette rate, the portion attributable to hardware (device and batteries) was 61% (ZAR 1.35 billion), while the portion attributable to e-liquid was 39% (ZAR 0.86 billion).

Conclusions: Calculated daily costs were higher for e-cigarettes than cigarettes. We recommend an e-cigarette excise tax. The government's proposed tax rate may reduce youth e-cigarette access, while allowing adult smokers wishing to switch exclusively to e-cigarettes to reduce their tobacco-related harm.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7842579PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/131861DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

excise tax
16
annual costs
12
south african
12
revenue e-cigarette
12
e-cigarette excise
12
tax rate
12
e-cigarette
10
daily e-cigarette
8
versus daily
8
daily cigarette
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Assessing the impact of the recent excise hike in Poland, with particular attention to differences between tertiary-educated and non-tertiary-educated populations.

Methods: We use the nationally representative Household Budget Survey data from 2010 to 2022 to estimate changes in smoking behaviour in response to cigarette affordability at both the extensive and intensive margins. Combining these estimates with European Health Interview Survey data, we simulate the effects of excise hikes for smoking prevalence and consumption in 2025-2027.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Although increases in alcohol excise taxation have been identified as one of the 'best buys' of the World Health Organization to reduce alcohol consumption and attributable harm, excise tax shares-the proportion of excise tax included in retail prices of alcoholic beverages-remain low in Europe. Revenue derived from alcohol excise taxation, and how it is affected by changes in alcohol excise taxation, has not yet been widely explored.

Methods: We conducted a search for revenues generated from alcohol excise taxation in all European Union (EU) countries and the United Kingdom between 2017 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: In the USA, every state imposes an excise tax for cigarettes, and virtually all states require tax stamps. Because cigarette taxes vary widely, traffickers smuggle cigarettes from states with low cigarette taxes into high-tax states to sell them illicitly for profits. With high cigarette taxes and roughly 565 000 adults who smoke, New York City (NYC) is an epicentre for the illicit trade of cigarettes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tobacco tax policy in South Africa: what went wrong and lessons for other countries.

Tob Control

August 2025

Research Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products, School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

In 1994, South Africa emerged as a leader in tobacco taxation among middle-income countries. From 1994 to 2009, sharp excise-tax increases, complemented by progressive tobacco-control legislation, led to major declines in smoking and significant revenue gains. However, since 2010, many of these gains have been reversed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF