Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of high-resolution (HR) MRI for detecting signal abnormalities of cranial nerves (CN) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients presenting with diplopia.
Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective single-center study included GCA patients who underwent 3-T HR MRI from December 2014 to January 2020. Two radiologists, blinded to all data, individually assessed for the presence of enhancement of the 3rd, 4th, and/or 6th CN on post-contrast HR imaging and high signal intensity on HR T2-WI, for signal abnormalities of extraocular muscles and the brainstem, and for inflammatory changes of the ophthalmic and extracranial arteries. A Fisher's exact test was used to compare patients with or without diplopia.
Results: In total, 64 patients (42/64 (66%) women and 22/64 (34%) men, mean age 76.3 ± 8 years) were included. Of the 64 patients, 14 (21.9%) presented with diplopia. Third CN enhancement was detected in 7/8 (87.5%) patients with 3rd CN impairment, as compared to no patients with 4th or 6th CN impairment or to patients without diplopia (p < 0.001). Third CN abnormal high signal intensity on HR T2-WI was detected in 4/5 patients (80%) with 3rd CN impairment versus none of other patients (p < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting 3rd CN signal abnormalities were of 0.88, 1, 1, and 0.99 and 0.8, 1, 1, and 0.98 for post-contrast HR imaging and HR T2-WI, respectively.
Conclusions: HR MRI had excellent diagnostic sensitivity and specificity when detecting signal abnormalities of the 3rd CN in GCA patients presenting with 3rd CN impairment.
Key Points: • Third cranial nerve enhancement was detected in all patients with 3rd cranial nerve impairment except for one with transient diplopia. • The "check mark sign" might be useful to identify 3rd cranial nerve signal abnormalities in the orbital apex. • No signal abnormalities of the 4th or 6th cranial nerves could be detected on high-resolution MRI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07595-x | DOI Listing |