98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The frequency of robotic-assisted bariatric surgery has been on the rise. An increasing number of fellowship programs have adopted robotic surgery as part of the curriculum. Our aim was to compare technical efficiency of a surgeon during the first year of practice after completing an advanced minimally invasive fellowship with a mentor surgeon.
Methods: A systematic review of a prospectively maintained database was performed of consecutive patients undergoing robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy between 2015 and 2019 at a tertiary-care bariatric center (mentor group) and between 2018 and 2019 at a semi-academic community-based bariatric program (mentee 1 group) and 2019-2020 at a tertiary-care academic center (mentee 2 group).
Results: 257 patients in the mentor group, 45 patients in the mentee 1 group, and 11 patients in the mentee 2 group were included. The mentee operative times during the first year in practice were significantly faster than the mentor's times in the first three (mentee 1 group) and two (mentee 2 group) years (P < 0.05) but remained significantly longer than the mentor's times in the last two (mentee 1 group) and one (mentee 2 group) years (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in venothromboembolic events (P = 0.89) or readmission rates (P = 0.93). The mean length of stay was 1.8 ± 0.5 days, 1.3 ± 0.5 days, and 1.5 ± 0.5 days in the mentor, mentee 1, and mentee 2 groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). There were no reoperations, conversion to laparoscopy or open, no staple line leaks, strictures, or deaths in any group.
Conclusions: This is one of the first series to show that the robotic platform can safely be taught and may translate into outcomes consistent with surgeons with more experience while mitigating the learning curve as early as the first year in practice. Long-term follow-up of mentees will be necessary to assess the evolution of fellowship training and outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08228-6 | DOI Listing |
J Prof Nurs
September 2025
College of Nursing, Brigham Young University, 566 KMBL, Provo, UT 84602, United States of America.
Background: Formal mentoring within the nursing profession has been recognized as an effective approach in teaching critical thinking, leadership skills, communication, and professional socialization. Unfortunately, few baccalaureate nursing programs teach skills specific to mentoring, both as mentees and mentors within a formalized program.
Methods: A peer mentoring program with senior students mentoring sophomore students was developed based on Benner's (1984) novice-to-expert theory during the COVID-19 pandemic.
PLoS One
September 2025
Department for Cardiology, Angiology, and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Background: Final year medical students (FYMS) in Germany transfer theoretical knowledge to clinical practice. However, there is a deficiency in structured guidance and feedback and self-reflective practices are often neglected. This study aims to investigate the impact of three mentoring strategies on cultivating self-reflection and introspection in FYMS and to assess competence during routine activities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
August 2025
Department of Paediatric Plastic Surgery, Evelina Hospital, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Introduction: Mentorship is integral to surgical training, yet access remains inequitable. Ethnic minority (EM) students, those from low-income households, and first-generation medical students face persistent barriers that hinder progression into competitive specialties like Plastic Surgery (PS). To address this, we piloted INSPIRE, a first-in-kind identity-concordant mentorship programme for UK undergraduates.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFN Z Med J
August 2025
Health New Zealand - Te Whatu Ora, Te Manawa Taki, Rotorua, New Zealand.
Aim: Wāhine Connect is a peer-mentoring organisation established in 2017 by a medical clinician to address an unmet need by enabling peer-to-peer wāhine mentorship in medicine and health in Aotearoa New Zealand. This retrospective descriptive study reports the demographic and work profiles of women seeking mentoring, their reasons for seeking mentoring and satisfaction with their experience of the programme.
Methods: Mentees' registration data were analysed to describe demographic characteristics of women seeking mentorship and the reasons women chose to seek mentorship.
Public Health Nutr
August 2025
Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Objective: To explore the development of the Nutrition Society of Australia's (NSA) mentoring program for Registered Nutritionists and evaluate the experience of the nutrition professionals participating in the mentoring program.
Design: Case study evaluation utilising a focus group, individual semi-structured interviews, open-ended survey responses, and document analysis, via an interpretivist lens.
Setting: Australia.