Health and hostile hospitality: Understanding asylum applicants' narratives of life and health in the UK.

Soc Sci Med

Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute, School of Arts Languages and Cultures, University of Manchester, Room C1.49, Ellen Wilkinson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Electronic address:

Published: November 2020


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

This paper explores how middle aged and older asylum applicants in the UK speak about health in relation to migratory experiences. It proposes biocredibility as a novel theoretical concept, through which the narratives of those migrating to the UK to seek asylum can be analysed. The UK government's hostile environments policies, which aim to make life uncomfortable for irregular migrants in the UK in order to drive down migration, have been criticised on legal, material and moral grounds. This paper adds to this critique. Narrative analysis of semi-structured interviews shows that the majority of the asylum applicants interviewed felt their health was poor and told of the difficulties of life in the UK. Stories of homelessness, poverty and exclusion dominated, underpinned by the erosion of their perceived trustworthiness and credibility through encounters with the Home Office. Particular personal experiences of social, political and economic strife in exile were narrated closely against stories of illness. The concept of biocredibility refers to, and provides a way of understanding, participants' propensity for creating narrative enclaves for pathographies as a discursive mechanism to add credibility to narratives of lived experience. In this way, visceral descriptions of biological suffering can function as a narrative resource. It does this firstly by providing material and social context for adverse health, thus allowing participants to attribute a socio-political cause for their illness. Secondly it interjects experiences of illness into life narratives, thus effectively communicating the significance of such experiences. Finally, it provides narrative evidence of individuals' autobiographical testimony. For discredited and marginalised asylum applicants, biocredibility can be understood to represent a strategy used to re-negotiate credibility and urges a critical consideration of the hostile and austere socio-political context in which it is observed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113509DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

asylum applicants
12
health
5
asylum
5
health hostile
4
hostile hospitality
4
hospitality understanding
4
understanding asylum
4
asylum applicants'
4
narratives
4
applicants' narratives
4

Similar Publications

Background: Despite increased focus on social determinants of health, little is known about screening and intervention for asylum seekers, a highly marginalized group. We present the feasibility of a pilot social needs screening and resource navigation program at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Asylum Clinic in Boston, Massachusetts.

Methods: Clinicians and staff referred patients who had a forensic evaluation in the clinic for screening.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The migrant experience through the lens of forensic medicine: the multifaceted utility of asylum applicants' medico-legal narratives and forensic evidence analysed over time.

Int J Legal Med

September 2025

Forensic Service for Asylum Seekers & Unaccompanied Minors, Laboratorio di Antropologia e Odontologia Forense, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, LABANOF, Sezione di Medicina Legale, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Luigi Mangiagalli 37, 20133, Milan, Italy.

The comprehensive involvement of forensic practitioners in asylum cases aids the accurate identification and overall evaluation of asylum applications, with demonstrated direct associations between asylum assessment application outcomes and medico-legal conclusions. Forensic involvement is ever more urgent with the increasing migration flows. This paper examines the multifaceted utility of analysing migrant narratives together with forensic data over an extended period: A detailed qualitative secondary analysis of data collected between 2008 and 2021 by the Milan Institute of Forensic Medicine, which includes all migrants who underwent a forensic assessment as unaccompanied foreign minors or torture victims.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Higher education institutions increasingly aim to implement equity in admissions. However, there is no one-size-fits-all solution to determine which equitable admissions procedures are suitable in a specific context, nor which groups should be its beneficiaries. Therefore, we applied the Formal Consensus Method (FCM) to investigate the support amongst experts and stakeholders for different equitable admissions policies and target groups within the context of Health Professions Education in The Netherlands.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The medical affidavit is critically significant for asylum seekers. Studies have shown that asylum seekers applying with a medical affidavit (versus without a medical affidavit) have double the success rate. There are many training resources for clinician-evaluators on the interviewing process, but little instruction exists on the affidavit writing process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Healthcare and support workers play a pivotal role in delivering quality services and support to people seeking sanctuary who have experienced poor physical and mental health linked to previous trauma, relocation and loss of freedoms. However, they often encounter various challenges in their daily work, ranging from communication barriers to resource constraints. This qualitative study seeks to delve into the perspectives of healthcare and support workers' experience of workarounds, employed to overcome barriers to providing care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF