Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter remain uncertain. DESIGN: RIVER was an academic-led, multicenter, open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial with blinded outcome adjudication that enrolled 1005 patients from 49 sites in Brazil. Patients with a bioprosthetic mitral valve and atrial fibrillation or flutter were randomly assigned (1:1) to rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (15 mg in those with creatinine clearance <50 mL/min) or dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-30.); the follow-up period was 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack, major bleeding, valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, or hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary composite outcome, bleeding events, and venous thromboembolism. SUMMARY: RIVER represents the largest trial specifically designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a direct oral anticoagulant in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter. The results of this trial can inform clinical practice and international guidelines.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients bioprosthetic
12
bioprosthetic mitral
12
atrial fibrillation
12
fibrillation flutter
12
efficacy safety
8
safety rivaroxaban
8
rivaroxaban patients
8
mitral valve
8
valve atrial
8
design river
8

Similar Publications

Background: Surgical treatment for infective endocarditis (IE) with severe thrombocytopenia is considered high risk and is often avoided.

Case Summary: A 67-year-old man with a history of 3 open-heart surgeries presented with fever and severe thrombocytopenia accompanied by a bleeding tendency. Blood cultures and transthoracic echocardiography confirmed IE of the aortic bioprosthetic valve caused by Candida parapsilosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Decision-making in valve reintervention: Redo-Transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs. explant surgery.

Cardiovasc Revasc Med

August 2025

Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA; Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address:

Objective: Data remain limited on factors influencing the selection of redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical explant in patients with failing transcatheter heart valves. This study aimed to identify clinical and procedural factors guiding treatment decisions.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included all patients who underwent aortic valve reintervention following prior TAVR at a U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Leaflet thrombosis and transcatheter heart valve dysfunction are key concerns following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Prolonged neo-sinus washout time (NWT) may predispose patients to hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) and leaflet thrombosis, increasing the risk of valve degeneration. This study evaluates the association between in vivo NWT derived from aortograms using computer vision and hemodynamic outcomes at 30 days and 1 year post-TAVR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Recent data demonstrate near equalization in the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and isolated bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients aged <65 years for treatment of isolated aortic stenosis (AS). Whether these trends are also seen across the entire spectrum of aortic valve replacement (AVR) procedures (including mechanical SAVR and concomitant procedures) is unknown.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients aged <65 years who underwent AVR for severe AS in the multicenter Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Group registry between 2015 and 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF