98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: Despite the frequent association between anxiety, depression and cardiovascular diseases (CVD), cardiovascular inpatients are not usually screened for these psychopathological conditions. To fill this gap, especially in hospital environments, there is the need of brief screening instruments that provide reliable information in a very short time. According to this need, the aim of this study was to examine the best cut-off points of two brief and easy-to-use questionnaires in a sample of Italian cardiovascular inpatients: the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) and the 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2).
Design: 3500 cardiovascular inpatients were recruited and completed both the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7). PHQ-2 and GAD-2 were then obtained extracting the first two item from PHQ-9 and GAD-7.
Main Outcome Measures: The PHQ-2 and GAD-2 psychometric properties were calculated comparing them with PHQ-9 and GAD-7, respectively.
Results: The PHQ-2 threshold of ≥ 2 and the GAD-2 threshold of ≥ 3 are the best solutions in balancing between sensitivity and specificity, also providing acceptable rates of false positives and false negatives.
Conclusions: the PHQ-2 and GAD-2 Italian versions showed good diagnostic features for measuring depression and anxiety in CVD patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1830093 | DOI Listing |
Background: Advancements in healthcare have significantly improved the prospect of patients with CHD, with over 97% now surviving adulthood. This growing population requires lifelong care and support to manage their condition. Digital health innovations, such as the "Ask Me Anything" (AMA) tool, aim to empower patients and improve collaboration with clinicians.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPalliat Support Care
September 2025
REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital, Nyborg, Denmark.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate healthcare professionals' experiences with using the PRO Palliative Care questionnaire (PRO-Pall) to identify palliative care symptoms and problems in non-specialized palliative care settings among patients with heart, lung, and kidney disease, and cancer. The study also investigated the PRO-Pall's potential to ensure further initiatives and care.
Methods: A national, multicenter, observational study employing a mixed-methods approach.
BMC Health Serv Res
September 2025
Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Seebad 82/83, Rüdersdorf, 15562, Germany.
Background: Hypertension remains a critical public health issue in Germany, affecting millions of individuals. Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) offer promising solutions for improving patient outcomes and adherence in hypertension management. Despite their advantages in healthcare, the adoption of mHealth apps by general practitioners (GPs) in Germany remains limited to date.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Inform Decis Mak
September 2025
Emergency Department, Helios Spital, Überlingen, Germany.
Background: The increasing amount of data routinely collected on ICUs poses a challenge for clinicians which is aggravated with data-heavy therapies like Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy (CKRT). We developed the CKRT Supporting Software Prototype (CKRT-SSP), a clinical decision support system for use before, during and after CKRT. The aim of this user experience (UX) study was to prospectively evaluate CKRT-SSP in terms of usability, user experience, and workload in a simulated ICU setting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Gen Intern Med
September 2025
University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1890 N Revere Ct, Third Floor, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Background: The SHARE Approach Model and training curriculum was developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to teach clinicians practicing in diverse settings how to engage in more effective Shared Decision Making (SDM).
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of the SHARE Approach at improving SDM in practices located across Colorado, USA.
Design: A longitudinal study with pre- and post-intervention observations.