Radiographic and Biomechanical Assessment of Three Implant Designs for Canine Cementless Total Hip Replacement.

Objective:  The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between radiographic fit/fill measurements and biomechanical performance of three canine cementless total hip implant designs using an biomechanical testing protocol that replicates compression and torsion.

Study Design:  Eighteen (six/group) canine cadaveric femurs were implanted with one of three cementless total hip implant designs: (1) collarless, (2) collared or (3) lateral bolt stems. Femoral length, canal flare index (CFI), canal fill, stem fit, stem level and stem angle were measured as independent variables. Biomechanical performance was tested using physiological, non-destructive gait loading () and destructive testing ().

Results:  During loading protocols, compressive stiffness was influenced by stem level ( < 0.05) and torsional stiffness was influenced by stem level and CFI for collarless stems ( < 0.05). During failure protocols, peak load was influenced by mediolateral (ML) stem angle ( < 0.05) and CFI ( < 0.01) for collarless stems and CFI for lateral bolt stems ( < 0.05). Peak torque was influenced by ML stem angle, craniocaudal stem angle and CFI for collarless stems ( < 0.05) and average ML fill for collared stems ( < 0.05).

Conclusion:  Biomechanical performance of collarless stems in cementless hip arthroplasty is more impacted by radiographic fit/fill than lateral bolt and collared stems. As a result, collarless stems may be more dependent on preoperative fit and intraoperative precision.