98%
921
2 minutes
20
Importance: Doses of fingolimod lower than 0.5 mg per day were not investigated during the fingolimod clinical development program. Whether lower doses of fingolimod might retain efficacy with fewer safety risks remains unknown.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fingolimod, 0.5 mg, and fingolimod, 0.25 mg, compared with glatiramer acetate and to assess whether these doses of fingolimod show superior efficacy to glatiramer acetate in adult patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Interventions: Fingolimod, 0.5 mg, or fingolimod, 0.25 mg, orally once per day or glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, subcutaneously once per day.
Design, Setting, And Participants: The Multiple Sclerosis Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Fingolimod Versus Copaxone (ASSESS) was a phase 3b multicenter randomized rater-blinded and dose-blinded 12-month clinical trial conducted between August 9, 2012, and April 30, 2018 (including the time required to recruit participants). A total of 1461 patients aged 18 to 65 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were screened, and 1064 participants were randomized. These participants had at least 1 documented relapse during the previous year or 2 documented relapses during the previous 2 years and an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0 to 6 at screening. Data were analyzed between September and November 2018.
Main Outcomes And Measures: The superiority of the fingolimod doses was tested hierarchically, with fingolimod, 0.5 mg, vs glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, tested first, followed by fingolimod, 0.25 mg, vs glatiramer acetate, 20 mg. The primary end point was the reduction in annualized relapse rate (ARR). Magnetic resonance imaging parameters, safety, and tolerability were also assessed.
Results: Of 1461 adult patients screened, 1064 participants (72.8%) were randomized (mean [SD] age, 39.6 [11.0] years; 792 women [74.4%]) to 3 treatment groups: 352 participants received fingolimod, 0.5 mg, 370 participants received fingolimod, 0.25 mg, and 342 participants received glatiramer acetate, 20 mg. In total, 859 participants (80.7%) completed the study. Treatment with fingolimod, 0.5 mg, was superior to treatment with glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, in reducing ARR (40.7% relative reduction); the relative reduction with fingolimod, 0.25 mg, was 14.6%, which was not statistically significant (for fingolimod, 0.5 mg, ARR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.11-0.21; for fingolimod, 0.25 mg, ARR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.17-0.29; for glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, ARR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.20-0.34). Treatment with both fingolimod doses (0.5 mg and 0.25 mg) significantly reduced new or newly enlarging T2 and gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions compared with treatment with glatiramer acetate. Adverse events were reported in similar proportions across treatment groups (312 participants [90.4%] in the fingolimod, 0.5 mg, group, 323 participants [88.3%] in the fingolimod, 0.25 mg, group, and 283 participants [87.3%] in the glatiramer acetate group).
Conclusions And Relevance: Fingolimod, 0.5 mg, demonstrated superior clinical efficacy compared with glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, and had a superior benefit-risk profile compared with fingolimod, 0.25 mg, in adult participants with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01633112.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445630 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2950 | DOI Listing |
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
September 2025
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Neurologie, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuroinflammation, Bron, France.
Unlabelled: BackgroundTarget trial emulation (TTE) offers a formal framework for causal inference using observational data, but its validity must be evaluated in each research domain by replicating randomised clinical trials (RCTs). We aimed to replicate eight RCTs evaluating the efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) using French registry data.
Methods: This multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted using data extracted in December 2023 from the (OFSEP) database.
Mult Scler
September 2025
Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA; Population Health Outcomes and Pharmacoepidemiology Education and Research (P-HOPER Center), University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Background: With advances in disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are living longer.
Objective: This study examined MS prevalence and DMT use among older adults 65 years and above in the United States.
Methods: The study analyzed 2011-2021 Medicare fee-for-service claims data.
JAMA Health Forum
August 2025
Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Importance: Brand-name drugs in the US are sold at high prices during market exclusivity periods defined by their patents, before prices are lowered by generic competition. Drug manufacturers use several strategies to extend these market exclusivity periods and delay generic competition, including obtaining overlapping thickets of patents.
Objective: To estimate excess US spending associated with delays in generic competition due to extended market exclusivity for 4 top-selling drugs.
Mult Scler Relat Disord
August 2025
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address:
Objective: To investigate whether the VIAADISC score predicts disease reactivation in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) after de-escalation/discontinuation of disease-modifying-therapy (DMT) METHODS: We included RMS patients who i) received any DMT other than interferon-beta or glatiramer-acetate ≥12 months, ii) de-escalated/discontinued DMT, iii) had MRI before de-escalation/discontinuation, and iv) had ≥12 months of follow-up. VIAADISC score (0-6; age <45/45-54/≥55 = 2/1/0 points, MRI activity = 2 points, duration without clinical disease activity <4/4-8/>8 years = 2/1/0 points) was calculated. The primary endpoint was disease reactivation (relapse and/or disability progression).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurol Ther
August 2025
Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Vigo, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo (CHUVI), Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain.
Introduction: Injectable drugs, including interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate (collectively referred to as BRACE), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and teriflunomide (TER) are commonly used as initial disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS), especially in patients with favorable prognostic profiles. Despite their continued use, real-world comparative data on long-term treatment persistence and comprehensive disease control remain limited.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 400 patients initiating BRACE (n = 132), DMF (n = 130), or TER (n = 138) between 2014 and 2024 in routine clinical practice.