98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: A simulator to enable safe practice and assessment of ALND has been designed, and face, content and construct validity has been investigated.
Summary And Background Data: The reduction in the number of ALNDs conducted has led to decreased resident exposure and confidence.
Methods: A cross-sectional multicenter observational study was carried out between July 2017 and August 2018. Following model development, 30 surgeons of varying experience (n = "experts," n = 11 "senior residents," and n = 10 "junior residents") were asked to perform a simulated ALND. Face and content validity questionnaires were administered immediately after ALND. All ALND procedures were retrospectively assessed by 2 attending breast surgeons, blinded to operator identity, using a video-based assessment tool, and an end product assessment tool.
Results: Statistically significant differences between groups were observed across all operative subphases on the axillary clearance assessment tool (P < 0.001). Significant differences between groups were observed for overall procedure quality (P < 0.05) and total number of lymph nodes harvested (P < 0.001). However, operator grade could not be distinguished across other end product variables such as axillary vein damage (P = 0.864) and long thoracic nerve injury (P = 0.094). Overall, participants indicated that the simulator has good anatomical (median score >7) and procedural realism (median score >7).
Conclusions: Video-based analysis demonstrates construct validity for ALND assessment. Given reduced ALND exposure, this simulation is a useful adjunct for both technical skills training and formative Deanery or Faculty administered assessments.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003946 | DOI Listing |
BMC Med Educ
September 2025
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management & Ethics (LIME) Widerströmska huset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Background: Live tissue training (LTT) refers to the use of live anaesthetised animals for the purpose of medical education. It is a type of simulation training that is contentious, and there is an ethical imperative for educators to justify the use of animals. This should include scrutinising educational practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Robot Surg
September 2025
Department of General Surgery, Giglio Hospital Foundation, Cefalu', Italy.
The adoption of robotic pancreatectomy has grown significantly in recent years, driven by its potential advantages in precision, minimally invasive access, and improved patient recovery. However, mastering these complex procedures requires overcoming a substantial learning curve, and the role of structured mentoring in facilitating this transition remains underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the number of cases required to achieve surgical proficiency, assess the impact of mentoring on skill acquisition, and analyze how outcomes evolve throughout the learning process.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Pharm Teach Learn
September 2025
Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Introduction: Pharmacy students were given the opportunity to participate in an online video-recorded objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) with pharmacist feedback. This study aimed to evaluate their views and experiences regarding this initiative and reviewing the recording.
Methods: Third year undergraduate pharmacy students (n = 68) were invited to participate in a formative video-recorded OSCE station online, followed by a one-to-one feedback discussion with a pharmacist facilitator.
Diabet Med
September 2025
Endocrinology Department, East Surrey Hospital, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
Aim: To explore the experiences of patients, families and clinicians managing steroid-induced hyperglycaemia (SIH) out of the hospital and identify areas for improved care.
Methods: We searched hospital records to identify patients requiring input from the diabetes inpatient team between February 2022 and March 2023 due to steroid usage. Clinicians, patients and their family members were interviewed remotely about their experiences of care and views on how to improve it.