98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Thoracentesis using suction is perceived to have increased risk of complications, including pneumothorax and re-expansion pulmonary oedema (REPO). Current guidelines recommend limiting drainage to 1.5 L to avoid REPO. Our purpose was to examine the incidence of complications with symptom-limited drainage of pleural fluid using suction and identify risk factors for REPO.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all adult patients who underwent symptom-limited thoracentesis using suction at our institution between January 1, 2004 and August 31, 2018 was performed, and a total of 10 344 thoracenteses were included.
Results: Pleural fluid ≥1.5 L was removed in 19% of the procedures. Thoracentesis was stopped due to chest discomfort (39%), complete drainage of fluid (37%) and persistent cough (13%). Pneumothorax based on chest radiography was detected in 3.98%, but only 0.28% required intervention. The incidence of REPO was 0.08%. The incidence of REPO increased with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥3 compounded with ≥1.5 L (0.04-0.54%; 95% CI 0.13-2.06 L). Thoracentesis in those with ipsilateral mediastinal shift did not increase complications, but less fluid was removed (p<0.01).
Conclusions: Symptom-limited thoracentesis using suction is safe even with large volumes. Pneumothorax requiring intervention and REPO are both rare. There were no increased procedural complications in those with ipsilateral mediastinal shift. REPO increased with poor ECOG PS and drainage ≥1.5 L. Symptom-limited drainage using suction without pleural manometry is safe.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02356-2019 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
August 2025
Respiratory Medicine, Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, Dartford, GBR.
Pressure-dependent pneumothorax is an under-recognized but clinically significant phenomenon that complicates pleural fluid drainage, particularly in patients with non-expandable lungs due to malignancy or chronic pleural fibrosis. Unlike pressure-independent pneumothorax, this condition arises from the pronounced transpleural pressure gradient generated during therapeutic thoracentesis or chest drainage. This negative pressure transiently distorts the visceral pleura, allowing air to enter the pleural space until an equilibrium is reached.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMonaldi Arch Chest Dis
July 2025
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Equipoise exists regarding the optimal method to drain pleural fluid during thoracentesis. While several institutions use wall-based automated suction, others point to the risk of excessively high suction pressures and therefore elevated barotrauma risk as a reason to avoid it. We first performed in vitro experiments involving drainage of a 1-liter saline bag using standard thoracentesis apparatus, a digital manometer, and either manual drainage (using a 60 mL syringe) or automated drainage (using wall suction at the maximum setting).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChest
December 2024
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address:
Background: Prior studies have found no differences in procedural chest discomfort for patients undergoing manual syringe aspiration or drainage with gravity after thoracentesis. However, whether gravity drainage could protect against chest pain due to the larger negative-pressure gradient generated by wall suction has not been investigated.
Research Question: Does wall suction drainage result in more chest discomfort compared with gravity drainage in patients undergoing large-volume thoracentesis?
Study Design And Methods: In this multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial, patients with large free-flowing effusions of ≥ 500 mL were assigned at a 1:1 ratio to wall suction or gravity drainage.
Medicine (Baltimore)
January 2024
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Thoracentesis is performed by 4 methods: gravity, manual aspiration, vacuum-bottle suction, and wall suction. This literature review investigates the safety of these techniques and determines if there is significant difference in complication rates. A comprehensive literature search revealed 6 articles studying thoracentesis techniques and their complication rates, reviewing 20,815 thoracenteses: 80 (0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF