A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Reference change values based on uncertainty models. | LitMetric

Reference change values based on uncertainty models.

Clin Biochem

Laboratori de Referència d'Enzimologia Clínica, Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.

Published: June 2020


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Different reference change values approaches are widely accepted to interpret the change between two consecutive measured values from the same biological quantity in an individual. Nevertheless, we propose two uncertainty-based models to estimate reference change values which will include all possible variation sources.

Methods: The models consisted in 1) estimation of the uncertainty related to each measured value, 2) calculation of the change between these values and its uncertainty, and 3) performing a compatibility study to know if the values are of the same degree of equivalence. Also, results obtained using the proposed models and the classical approaches are shown.

Results: The primary uncertainty sources corresponded to the within-subject biological, followed by those related to the analytical or pre-analytical phase, and post-analytical, respectively. We observed higher reference change values when our models were applied than those obtained using the classical approaches.

Conclusions: The estimation of reference change values using our models could be more realistic than the classical approaches because more identified variation sources were considered. We hope that this study will help and stimulate clinical laboratories to perform uncertainty and reference change values studies, and it allows a greater understanding of these concepts and its application in disease monitoring.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.03.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

change values
28
reference change
24
values
9
classical approaches
8
values models
8
change
7
reference
6
models
6
uncertainty
5
values based
4

Similar Publications