98%
921
2 minutes
20
The red wolf (Canis rufus), a legally recognized and critically endangered wolf, is known to interbreed with coyotes (Canis latrans). Declared extirpated in the wild in 1980, red wolves were reintroduced to northeastern North Carolina nearly a decade later. Interbreeding with coyotes was thought to be restricted to a narrow geographic region adjacent to the reintroduced population and largely believed to threaten red wolf recovery. However, red wolf ancestry was recently discovered in canids along the American Gulf Coast, igniting a broader survey of ancestry in southeastern canid populations. Here, we examine geographic and temporal patterns of genome-wide red wolf ancestry in 260 canids across the southeastern United States at over 164 000 SNP loci. We found that red wolf ancestry was most prevalent in canids sampled from Texas in the mid-1970s, although non-trivial amounts of red wolf ancestry persist in this region today. Further, red wolf ancestry was also observed in a subset of coyotes inhabiting North Carolina, despite management efforts to limit the occurrence of hybridization events. Lastly, we found no evidence of substantial red wolf ancestry in southeastern canids outside of these 2 admixture zones. Overall, this study provides a genome-wide survey of red wolf ancestry in canids across the southeastern United States, which may ultimately inform future red wolf restoration efforts.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esaa006 | DOI Listing |
Sci Rep
September 2025
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran.
Habitat fragmentation and the disruption of connectivity caused by roads are major concerns for the conservation of large carnivores as apex predator. The central arid plains of Iran support a variety of carnivore species, which their populations have sharply decreased because of habitat destruction, deterioration, and fragmentation. This study was conducted in the three conservation areas (CAs) and surrounded landscapes in central plains of Iran, focusing on two large carnivores: the grey wolf and the Persian leopard.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
August 2025
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Biotic and abiotic factors influence species habitat selection across space and time. Predator habitat selection is often studied in relation to their primary prey, however, how predators shift their space use in response to secondary prey and the corresponding ecological consequences have received less attention. We used four years (2018, 2020, 2021, 2022) of wolf (Canis lupus) GPS data to examine how wolf habitat selection relates to active American beaver (Castor canadensis) lodge locations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPathogens
August 2025
Institute of Parasitology, Biomedical Research Center Seltersberg (BFS), Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
The metastrongyloid nematodes , , and can cause severe cardiopulmonary and respiratory symptoms in domestic dogs and cats and free-ranging canids and felids (e.g., foxes, wolves, wild cats, lynxes).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGenes (Basel)
July 2025
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana M. Aleandri, 58100 Grosseto, Italy.
: The gene pool of the Apennine wolf is affected by admixture with domestic variants due to anthropogenic hybridisation with dogs. Genetic monitoring at the population level involves assessing the extent of admixture in single individuals, ranging from pure wolves to recent hybrids or wolf backcrosses, through the analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers. Although individually non-diagnostic, mtDNA is nevertheless essential for completing the final diagnosis of genetic admixture.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF