COM1, a factor of alternative non-homologous end joining, lagging behind the classic non-homologous end joining pathway in rice somatic cells.

Plant J

Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics of Ministry of Education/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genomics and Molecular Breeding/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, Chin

Published: July 2020


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The role of rice (Oryza sativa) COM1 in meiotic homologous recombination (HR) is well understood, but its part in somatic double-stranded break (DSB) repair remains unclear. Here, we show that for rice plants COM1 conferred tolerance against DNA damage caused by the chemicals bleomycin and mitomycin C, while the COM1 mutation did not compromise HR efficiencies and HR factor (RAD51 and RAD51 paralogues) localization to irradiation-induced DSBs. Similar retarded growth at the post-germination stage was observed in the com1-2 mre11 double mutant and the mre11 single mutant, while combined mutations in COM1 with the HR pathway gene (RAD51C) or classic non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway genes (KU70, KU80, and LIG4) caused more phenotypic defects. In response to γ-irradiation, COM1 was loaded normally onto DSBs in the ku70 mutant, but could not be properly loaded in the MRE11 plant and in the wortmannin-treated wild-type plant. Under non-irradiated conditions, more DSB sites were occupied by factors (MRE11, COM1, and LIG4) than RAD51 paralogues (RAD51B, RAD51C, and XRCC3) in the nucleus of wild-type; protein loading of COM1 and XRCC3 was increased in the ku70 mutant. Therefore, quite differently to its role for HR in meiocytes, rice COM1 specifically acts in an alternative NHEJ pathway in somatic cells, based on the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex and facilitated by PI3K-like kinases. NHEJ factors, not HR factors, preferentially load onto endogenous DSBs, with KU70 restricting DSB localization of COM1 and XRCC3 in plant somatic cells.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14715DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-homologous joining
12
somatic cells
12
com1
10
classic non-homologous
8
rad51 paralogues
8
nhej pathway
8
dsbs ku70
8
ku70 mutant
8
com1 xrcc3
8
com1 factor
4

Similar Publications

Contributions of DNA double strand break repair pathways to DNA crosslink repair.

DNA Repair (Amst)

August 2025

Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Med

DNA crosslink-inducing drugs are widely used in clinical settings for treatment of solid tumors. Double strand breaks (DSBs) that arise during interstrand crosslink (ICL) repair are crucial determinants of the therapeutic response, as they lead to cell death if not repaired. DSBs can be repaired through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), theta-mediated end joining (TMEJ), and homologous recombination (HR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Double-strand breaks represent the most dangerous form of DNA damage, and in resting cells, these breaks are sealed via the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) factor Ligase IV (LIG4). Excessive NHEJ may be genotoxic, necessitating multiple mechanisms to control NHEJ activity. However, a clear mechanism of transcriptional control for them has not yet been identified.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nuclear mitochondrial DNA transfer revisited: From genomic noise to hallmark of aging.

Ageing Res Rev

September 2025

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, LUM University, Casamassima, Italy. Electronic address:

Nuclear insertions of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) segments (NUMTs) represent an evolutionarily conserved phenomenon originating from the ancient endosymbiotic relationship between mitochondria and host cells. These insertions predominantly localize near intergenic or regulatory regions and are often enriched in tissues with high metabolic activity. Once regarded as inert pseudogenes or genomic artifacts, NUMTs are now recognized as dynamic elements capable of modulating nuclear architecture and cellular function.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Chromatin-associated circRNA ciCRLF3(2) regulates cell differentiation blockage via activating non-homologous end joining-based DNA repair.

Cell Death Differ

September 2025

MOE Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Regulation, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Functional Genes, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

DNA damage response (DDR) is a complicated network that responds to DNA lesions to prevent their accumulation; a defective DDR is one hallmark of cancer. Although targeting DDR pathways has been considered as a therapeutic approach, DDR inhibitors have also been reported ineffective for treating some low mutation burden cancers, such as Mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL)-rearranged (MLL-r) leukemia, a clinically fatal and refractory malignancy. Exploring the roles and mechanisms of DDR pathways in these low mutation burden cancers may help understand the chromatin biology and develop therapeutic strategies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a significant global health challenge. Gut microbiota imbalance and abnormal chromatin modifications play critical roles in the progression of CRC. However, the mechanisms by which they exert their influences, particularly the involvement of ()-mediated post-translational modifications (PTMs), remain inadequately understood.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF