98%
921
2 minutes
20
cis-Regulatory communication is crucial in mammalian development and is thought to be restricted by the spatial partitioning of the genome in topologically associating domains (TADs). Here, we discovered that the Xist locus is regulated by sequences in the neighboring TAD. In particular, the promoter of the noncoding RNA Linx (LinxP) acts as a long-range silencer and influences the choice of X chromosome to be inactivated. This is independent of Linx transcription and independent of any effect on Tsix, the antisense regulator of Xist that shares the same TAD as Linx. Unlike Tsix, LinxP is well conserved across mammals, suggesting an ancestral mechanism for random monoallelic Xist regulation. When introduced in the same TAD as Xist, LinxP switches from a silencer to an enhancer. Our study uncovers an unsuspected regulatory axis for X chromosome inactivation and a class of cis-regulatory effects that may exploit TAD partitioning to modulate developmental decisions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964159 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2019.10.030 | DOI Listing |
Immunol Cell Biol
April 2025
Allergy and Clinical Immunology Laboratory, Department of Immunology, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University and Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
In this article, we discuss a recent study, where autosomal monoallelic expression of genes underlying Inborn Errors of Immunity were investigated. About 2-10% of genes are predominantly transcribed from a single allele leading to autosomal random monoallelic expression (I). If this is skewed in a cell population from an individual with an autosomal dominant inborn error of immunity, this can lead to a mild to no phenotype (incomplete penetrance) if the wildtype allele is favored (II), or to more severe disease presentation if the variant allele is favored (III).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNature
January 2025
Columbia Center for Genetic Errors of Immunity, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Development
May 2024
Systems Epigenetics, Otto Warburg Laboratories, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
This Review elucidates the regulatory principles of random monoallelic expression by focusing on two well-studied examples: the X-chromosome inactivation regulator Xist and the olfactory receptor gene family. Although the choice of a single X chromosome or olfactory receptor occurs in different developmental contexts, common gene regulatory principles guide monoallelic expression in both systems. In both cases, an event breaks the symmetry between genetically and epigenetically identical copies of the gene, leading to the expression of one single random allele, stabilized through negative feedback control.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiochemistry (Mosc)
January 2024
Federal Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119071, Russia.
The review discusses the mechanisms of monoallelic expression, such as genomic imprinting, in which gene transcription depends on the parental origin of the allele, and random monoallelic transcription. Data on the regulation of gene activity in the imprinted regions are summarized with a particular focus on the areas controlling imprinting and factors influencing the variability of the imprintome. The prospects of studies of the monoallelic expression are discussed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUndefined epigenetic programs act to probabilistically silence individual autosomal alleles, generating unique individuals, even from genetic clones. This sort of random monoallelic expression can explain variation in traits and diseases that differences in genes and environments cannot. Here, we developed the nematode to study monoallelic expression in whole tissues, and defined a developmental genetic regulation pathway.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF