Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, -Mutated Advanced NSCLC.

N Engl J Med

From Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (S.S.R.); the Respiratory Oncology Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (J.V.); the Thoracic Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif (D.P.,

Published: January 2020


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations. A phase 3 trial compared first-line osimertinib with other EGFR-TKIs in patients with mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The trial showed longer progression-free survival with osimertinib than with the comparator EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.46). Data from the final analysis of overall survival have not been reported.

Methods: In this trial, we randomly assigned 556 patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with an mutation (exon 19 deletion or L858R allele) in a 1:1 ratio to receive either osimertinib (80 mg once daily) or one of two other EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg once daily or erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg once daily, with patients receiving these drugs combined in a single comparator group). Overall survival was a secondary end point.

Results: The median overall survival was 38.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5 to 41.8) in the osimertinib group and 31.8 months (95% CI, 26.6 to 36.0) in the comparator group (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95.05% CI, 0.64 to 1.00; P = 0.046). At 3 years, 79 of 279 patients (28%) in the osimertinib group and 26 of 277 (9%) in the comparator group were continuing to receive a trial regimen; the median exposure was 20.7 months and 11.5 months, respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 42% of the patients in the osimertinib group and in 47% of those in the comparator group.

Conclusions: Among patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with an mutation, those who received osimertinib had longer overall survival than those who received a comparator EGFR-TKI. The safety profile for osimertinib was similar to that of the comparator EGFR-TKIs, despite a longer duration of exposure in the osimertinib group. (Funded by AstraZeneca; FLAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02296125.).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1913662DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

osimertinib group
16
advanced nsclc
12
comparator group
12
osimertinib
10
survival osimertinib
8
osimertinib comparator
8
comparator egfr-tkis
8
hazard ratio
8
patients untreated
8
untreated advanced
8

Similar Publications

Background: Approximately 17% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) NSCLC, 84% of which are exon 19 deletions (Ex19del)/exon 21 substitutions (L858R). Unmet needs for patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for EGFRm (Ex19del/L858R) advanced NSCLC, including osimertinib, are relevant to US population health decision makers.

Objectives: To describe healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs by line of therapy (LOT) among patients with EGFRm (Ex19del/L858R) advanced NSCLC initiating first-line (1L) treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-driven non-small cell lung cancer (eLC) is a leading cause of death. The FLAURA study showed that upfront osimertinib (U-OSI) led to better overall survival (OS) than gefitinib or erlotinib, regardless of T790M status in advanced disease. However, if sequenced optimally, sequential OSI (S-OSI) in T790M-positive patients after first- or second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (F-S-EGFR-TKI) should theoretically lead to better OS than U-OSI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) magnitude of clinical benefit (MCBS) version 1.1 is an evaluation scale that was developed to evaluate the magnitude of clinical benefit reported in clinical research studies of cancer treatments. The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) created joint guidelines for the use of local therapy in the management of extracranial oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Osimertinib is the preferred first-line (L1) treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant (m) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). Intensification of L1 with chemotherapy or amivantamab has shown improved outcomes at the cost of increased toxicity, raising questions about the optimal patients selection. A sequence involving first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (1G) followed by osimertinib might be considered.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of osimertinib as a first-line therapy in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in a Spanish real-world setting.

Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at eight centers. The primary objective was to assess the effect of osimertinib on progression-free survival (PFS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF