Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: EGFR mutational testing is crucial for advanced non-squamous NSCLC. PAP is a sensitive and selective method to detect rare mutations.
Methods: Eighty-five patients with non-squamous NSCLC were enrolled in this study. A set of paired plasma samples from each patient were collected and detected by PAP and ARMS.
Results: Of 85 paired samples, 78.8% (67/85) presented the same mutational status by the two methods. There was no statistically significant difference between the mutation frequencies in plasma samples detected with PAP and ARMS (p = 0.096).
Conclusions: PAP technology appears to be an alternative choice with relatively high sensitivity for the detection of plasma EGFR mutations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.190216 | DOI Listing |