Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Central pancreatectomy (CP) is the alternative to distal pancreatectomy (DP) for specific pathologies of the mid-pancreas. However, the benefits of CP over DP remain controversial. This study aims to compare the two procedures by conducting a meta-analysis of all published papers.

Methods: A systematic search of original studies comparing CP vs. DP was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases up to June 2018. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist was followed.

Results: Twenty-one studies were included (596 patients with CP and 1070 patients with DP). Compared to DP, CP was associated with significantly higher rates of overall and severe morbidity (p < 0.0001), overall and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (p < 0.0001), postoperative hemorrhage (p = 0.02), but with significantly lower incidences of new-onset (p < 0.0001) and worsening diabetes mellitus (p = 0.004). Furthermore, significantly longer length of hospital stay (p < 0.0001) was observed for CP patients.

Conclusions: CP is superior to DP regarding the preservation of pancreatic functions, but at the expense of significantly higher complication rates and longer hospital stay. Proper selection of patients is of utmost importance to maximize the benefits and mitigate the risks of CP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01829-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

central pancreatectomy
8
pancreatectomy comprehensive
4
comprehensive up-to-date
4
up-to-date meta-analysis
4
meta-analysis background
4
background central
4
pancreatectomy alternative
4
alternative distal
4
distal pancreatectomy
4
pancreatectomy specific
4

Similar Publications

Background: Historically intraoperative drains were employed after pancreatic surgery but over the last decade, there has been debate over the routine usage of drains.

Aim: To assess the necessity of intra-abdominal drain placement, identify the most effective drain type, and determine the optimal timing for drain removal.

Methods: A systematic review of electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar, was conducted using Medical Subject Headings and keywords until December 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Prophylactic abdominal drainage has been widely used in pancreatic surgery to mitigate postoperative morbidity. Nonetheless, recent evidence suggests that a no-drain policy presents similar results to routine drainage. Therefore, we conducted an updated meta-analysis on this topic to provide up to date clinical recommendations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An octogenarian male patient who had experienced 2 bleeding episodes in 1 year was hospitalized for melena. During the examination for the obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, a mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) was found, and an endoscopic ultrasound examination revealed a 4-mm splenic artery aneurysm protruding from the same lesion in the pancreatic tail. Distal pancreatectomy was performed, and the pathological diagnosis revealed ruptured blood vessels and blood components within the IPMN.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a painful disease that can be refractory to multiple medical, endoscopic, and surgical interventions. Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) is a procedure that may be used to manage CP while potentially preserving endocrine pancreatic function. This study aims to ascertain quality of life (QoL) and pain outcomes among CP patients after TPIAT through a systematic review of published literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Surgical approach and postoperative outcomes after left pancreatectomy (Spandispan prospective project).

Cir Esp (Engl Ed)

August 2025

Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain; Instituto de Investigación ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain; Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain.

Introduction: Left pancreatectomy (LP) is a surgical technique with low mortality but high morbidity (30%), particularly pancreatic fistula (PF). Its minimally invasive (MI) approach has become popular, but its implementation in Spain remains unknown. We present a national multicentre study on LP to determine morbidity-mortality, PF incidence, and the percentage of MI approach.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF