A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Understanding of binding energy calibration in XPS of lanthanum oxide by in situ treatment. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Rare earth oxides have seen increased usage over the years in batteries and catalysts. Due to their unique electronic properties, they are the subject of fundamental and practical interest. However, the complexity in their electronic structures makes unambiguous characterization, such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), very challenging. Lanthanum oxide (LaO) has attracted special attention as a promising catalyst for the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) reaction. In this work, a new and reliable way of XPS calibration is developed by applying various in situ preparations for a nanorod LaO catalyst to intentionally form different lanthanum compounds, followed by XPS characterization and corroboration with first principles calculations. To form different compounds, five sample treatments were performed including heating in vacuum and treatment with O, CH, CO, and HO, which are all relevant to OCM reaction conditions. Adventitious carbon or lattice oxygen, as conventional calibration standard species for energy scale, is only suitable for one or few in situ prepared surfaces. Our results also clearly demonstrate the vital difference between performing the ex situ analysis after exposure of the sample to the atmosphere and the in situ analysis. By carefully comparing the spectra of various photoemission peaks of different compounds, we conclude that the binding energy of 102.2 eV for the La 4d peak can be used as the internal calibration standard for all considered samples. Furthermore, different oxygen species were unambiguously identified by matching the oxygen 1s binding energies from the in situ measurements and first principles predictions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9cp04187gDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

binding energy
8
lanthanum oxide
8
ocm reaction
8
calibration standard
8
situ analysis
8
situ
6
understanding binding
4
calibration
4
energy calibration
4
xps
4

Similar Publications