98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The overall use of intensive care units (ICUs) in the United States has been steadily increasing and is associated with tremendous health care costs. We suspect that the burden of ICU utilization after elective infrainguinal lower extremity bypass (LEB) procedures is high, despite relatively low risks of complications in the immediate postoperative period. We sought to identify the burden of ICU utilization after elective LEB in patients with claudication.
Methods: We queried the Premier Healthcare Database for all adult patients undergoing first recorded elective infrainguinal LEB for claudication from 2009 to 2015. Baseline characteristics and ICU utilization on postoperative day 0 (POD 0) were identified for each patient using Premier room and board chargemaster codes. A bivariate logistic regression was performed and postestimation concordance statistics were calculated to identify predictors of postoperative ICU vs regular surgical floor admission immediately after surgery.
Results: There were 6010 patients who met the selection criteria, of whom 2772 (46.1%) were admitted to the ICU and 3238 (53.9%) to the regular surgical floor on POD 0. Whereas patient-level factors were responsible for minor differences found in postoperative admission to the ICU after elective LEB, hospital characteristics made up the majority of variation in admission practices. Specifically, patients undergoing elective infrainguinal LEB in rural, nonteaching, small hospitals and those in certain geographic regions were more likely to be admitted to the ICU than to the floor (all, P < .001). Patient-level factors were poorly predictive of admission to the ICU immediately postoperatively, with C statistics ranging from 0.50 to 0.53. In contrast, hospital-level factors had higher C statistics ranging from 0.51 to 0.66, with geographic location being the strongest predictor of post-LEB ICU admission. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative wound complications, major adverse limb events, major adverse cardiac events, or in-hospital mortality between groups (all, P ≥ .32). The median total hospital cost was $2340 higher for ICU compared with floor admission ($13,273 [interquartile range, $10,136-$17,883] vs $10,927 [interquartile range, $8342-$14,523]; P < .001).
Conclusions: Nearly half of patients are admitted to an ICU directly after elective infrainguinal LEB for claudication. This practice is associated with significantly higher hospital cost and is predominantly influenced by hospital-level rather than by patient-level factors. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were similar regardless of postoperative disposition. To minimize ICU utilization, postoperative care intensity should be determined by clinical severity of the patient rather than by hospital routine.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.182 | DOI Listing |
J Vasc Surg
June 2025
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI. Electronic address:
Objective: The Society for Vascular Surgery recommends preoperative vein mapping (PVM) and the use of autologous vein (AV) conduits when available for infrainguinal bypass (IIB). This study aims to evaluate the association between the presence of a vascular surgery (VS) training program at a medical center and the utilization of PVM and AV conduits in IIB procedures.
Methods: Patients undergoing an elective IIB for peripheral artery disease (PAD) between 2016 and 2022 were identified in a prospective, statewide, multicenter observational registry.
J Vasc Surg
July 2025
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address:
Objective: The Vascular Quality Initiative Frailty Index (VQI-FI) was developed using seven variables captured in all VQI registries and combined with procedure risk to provide a simple mortality risk assessment tool for preoperative decision-making. This study was designed to validate the ability of the VQI-FI within a subgroup population for discriminating long-term mortality risk among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing common elective vascular procedures.
Methods: The VISION VQI-Medicare linked database (2010-2019) was used to assess survival among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing elective vascular procedures from seven arterial VQI registries.
J Vasc Surg
July 2025
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Objective: Nonhome discharge (NHD) contributes to poor patient quality of life and health care costs. Prior Vascular Study Group of New England database-based analysis developed a novel risk score for NHD after infrainguinal lower extremity bypass (LEB). Still, it has yet to be validated in an external dataset.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
April 2025
Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Objective: Major amputation and death are significant outcomes after lower limb revascularisation for chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI), but there is limited evidence on their association with the timing of revascularisation. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between time from non-elective admission to revascularisation and one year outcomes for patients with CLTI.
Methods: This was an observational, population based cohort study of patients aged ≥ 50 years with CLTI admitted non-electively for infrainguinal revascularisation procedures in English National Health Service hospitals from January 2017 to December 2019 recorded in the Hospital Episode Statistics database.
J Vasc Surg
March 2025
Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Background: The best modality for elective popliteal artery aneurysm repair (PAR) remains controversial. Most single-center studies suggest that open popliteal aneurysm repair (OPAR) is more durable than endovascular PAR (EPAR), but large, randomized, multicenter studies are lacking. This study compares long-term outcomes of EPAR and OPAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative-Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network (VISION) database.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF