Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: This article compares the dosimetric differences between jaw tracking and no jaw tracking technique in static intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans of large and small tumors.

Methods: Eight plans with large tumor (nasopharyngeal carcinoma, volume range: 510.9 to 768.0 cm) and 8 plans with small tumor (single brain metastasis, volume range: 5.3 to 9.9 cm) treated with jaw tracking on Varian EDGE LINAC were chosen and recalculated with no jaw tracking to study the dosimetric differences. We compared the differences of organ-at-risk doses (Dmax, Dmean), monitor units, and γ passing rate of plan verification (3mm/3%, threshold 10%; 2mm/2%, threshold 10%) between the 2 techniques.

Results: The organ-at-risk doses of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases having jaw tracking are all less than those with no jaw tracking. The Dmax and Dmean of organ-at-risks reduced 0.61% to 17.65% and 2.17% to 19.32%, P < .05, respectively. In cases with single brain metastasis, the organ-at-risk doses with jaw tracking were also lower than no jaw tracking. The Dmax and Dmean of organ-at-risk doses reduced 0.84% to 1.52% and 0.90% to 1.86%, P < .05, respectively. The monitor units for the large tumor and small tumor were increased by 2.41% and 1.1%, respectively. The γ passing rates (3mm/3%, th10%; 2mm/2%, th10%) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma plans are 99.89% ± 0.06% (jaw tracking) versus 99.56% ± 0.19% (no jaw tracking; P = .127); 97.15% ± 0.98% (jaw tracking) versus 91.90% ± 1.40% (no jaw tracking; P = .000), and the γ passing rates (3mm/3%, th10%; 2mm/2%, th10%) of brain metastasis plans are 99.97% ± 0.05% (jaw tracking) versus 99.44% ± 1.24% (no jaw tracking; P = .251), 98.65% ± 1.27% (jaw tracking) versus 93.35% ± 2.72% (no jaw tracking; P = .000).

Conclusion: Jaw tracking can reduce the dose of organ-at-risks compared to no jaw tracking, and the effect is more significant for plans with large tumor. The γ passing rate of plans with jaw tracking is also higher than the plans with no jaw tracking. Although the monitor units in plans of jaw tracking will increase slightly, it is recommended to use jaw tracking in static intensity-modulated radiation therapy both in large and in small tumors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6488724PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033819841061DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

jaw tracking
96
jaw
24
tracking
24
organ-at-risk doses
16
tracking versus
16
tracking jaw
12
intensity-modulated radiation
12
radiation therapy
12
plans large
12
large tumor
12

Similar Publications

Purpose: This study investigated how different data collection methods affect final restoration design and dynamic occlusal morphology.

Materials And Methods: Digital systems allow intraoral recording of functional occlusal paths through the digitally recorded functionally generated pathway (DRFGP) technique, using intraoral scanners and optical jaw tracking. Two substudies were conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study comprehensively evaluated the impact of aperture shape controller (ASC) on volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) clinical treatment planning.

Methods: A total of 248 VMAT plans for head and neck, prostate, post mastectomy breast, gastric MALT lymphoma, rectum, and Lung SBRT for treatments performed between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. These treatment plans were divided into two groups: before (ASC-OFF group) and after (ASC-ON group) the clinical implementation of ASC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Statement Of Problem: Various digital workflows are available to capture the maxillomandibular relationship at an increased vertical dimension, including the use of intraoral scanners (IOSs) and optical jaw tracking systems. However, limited evidence exists for the virtual determination of an increased vertical dimension using jaw-tracking devices.

Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the acquisition of the maxillomandibular relationship at an increased vertical dimension with the virtual determination through a jaw-tracking system and by using an IOS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background and purpose Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a C-arm linear accelerator has been adopted for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treating brain tumors. Some treatment planning systems (TPSs) generate sequences that align the jaw with the edge of the multileaf collimator (MLC) radiation field during VMAT. However, the jaw exhibits greater geometric positioning uncertainty than the MLC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Integrating jaw motion tracking and a maxillary complete denture in a digital workflow for immediate mandibular implant loading.

J Prosthet Dent

July 2025

Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:

A digital workflow for the simultaneous rehabilitation of a fully edentulous maxilla and a partially edentulous posterior mandible requiring immediate implant loading is described. To provide stable occlusal support during mandibular surgery, a maxillary interim complete denture was fabricated in advance. Given the risk of occlusal wear, monolithic zirconia was selected for the fabrication of the definitive maxillary denture.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF