98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: This study aimed to assess the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) using combined data from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (I and II).
Methods: MCID estimates for the mRSS at 12 months were calculated using three anchors: change in scores on the Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index from baseline to 12 months, change in scores on the Patient Global Assessment from baseline to 12 months, and answer at 12 month for the Short Form-36 health transition question "Compared to one year ago, how would you rate your health in general now?" We determined the mRSS MCID estimates for all participants and for those with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). We then assessed associations between MCID estimates of mRSS improvement and patient-reported outcomes, using Student's t test to compare the mean differences in patient outcomes between those who met the MCID improvement criteria versus those who did not meet the improvement criteria.
Results: The mean (SD) mRSS at baseline was 14.75 (10.72) for all participants and 20.93 (9.61) for those with dcSSc. The MCID estimate for mRSS improvement at 12 months ranged from 3 to 4 units for the overall group (improvement of 20-27% from baseline) and was 5 units for those with dcSSc (improvement of 24% from baseline). Those who met the mRSS MCID improvement criteria had statistically significant improvements in scores on the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary, the Transition Dyspnea Index, and joint contractures at 12 months.
Conclusion: MCID estimates for the mRSS were 3-4 units for all participants and 5 units for those with dcSSc. These findings are consistent with previously reported MCID estimates for systemic sclerosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335851 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1809-y | DOI Listing |
ERJ Open Res
September 2025
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background: Previous studies have shown that increasing physical activity in daily life (PADL) improves asthma clinical control and quality of life. However, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to promote those improvements remains unclear. The aim of this study was to estimate the MCID for PADL in people with moderate-to-severe asthma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlpha Psychiatry
August 2025
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, 143-8541 Tokyo, Japan.
Background/objective: Whether changes in Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8) scores adequately reflect subjective improvement in patients with somatic symptoms and related disorders (SSRD) at follow-up is unclear. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is a criterion of estimating clinically significant improvement derived from patients' responses to anchor questions that accurately reflect changes in their condition. This study aimed to clarify the MCID value of the SSS-8 for SSRD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS Med
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Background: The optimal management of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in older patients remains debatable. A knowledge gap exists concerning how to manage fractures with early malalignment during nonoperative treatment. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, and randomized controlled trial to compare nonoperative treatment to operative treatment with volar locking plating (VLP) in the management of primarily malaligned DRFs and DRFs that exhibit early malalignment during nonoperative treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJACC Heart Fail
September 2025
University of Missouri Healthcare Institute for Innovations in Quality, Kansas City, Missouri, USA; Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Background: Although the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) assesses important outcomes for patients with heart failure, whether a 5-point change in KCCQ represents a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in an individual patient with very poor, as compared with very good, heart failure severity is unknown.
Objectives: This study aims to define MCIDs for the KCCQ-Overall Summary Score (OSS) and KCCQ-Clinical Summary Score (CSS) across the range of baseline health status.
Methods: Outpatients with heart failure with ejection fractions ≤40% recruited from 14 clinics completed KCCQs at baseline and 6 ± 2 weeks later, along with a 15-point Likert scale assessing their perceived changes in health status.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
September 2025
Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of death in China. However, few national surveys have comprehensively evaluated the health and economic outcomes among COPD patients in China. The objective of this study was to examine and compare the humanistic and economic burden of COPD patients with a control group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF