Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

NEPA is the first fixed-combination antiemetic composed of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist netupitant (netupitant; 300 mg) and the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist palonosetron (palonosetron; 0.50 mg). This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic profiles of netupitant and palonosetron. The pharmacokinetic profiles of both drugs were summarized using data from phase 1-3 clinical trials. netupitant and palonosetron have high absolute bioavailability (63%-87% and 97%, respectively). Their overall systemic exposures and maximum plasma concentrations are similar under fed and fasting conditions. netupitant binds to plasma proteins in a high degree (>99%), whereas palonosetron binds to a low extent (62%). Both drugs have large volumes of distribution (cancer patients: 1656-2257 L and 483-679 L, respectively). netupitant is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 to 3 major pharmacologically active metabolites (M1, M2, and M3). palonosetron is metabolized by cytochrome P450 2D6 to 2 major substantially inactive metabolites (M4 and M9). Both drugs have similar intermediate-to-low systemic clearances and long half-lives (cancer patients: netupitant, 19.5-20.8 L/h and 56.0-93.8 hours; palonosetron: 7.0-11.3 L/h and 43.8-65.7 hours, respectively). netupitant and its metabolites are eliminated via the hepatic/biliary route (87% of the administered dose), whereas palonosetron and its metabolites are mainly eliminated via the kidneys (85%-93%). Altogether, these data explain the lack of pharmacokinetic interactions between netupitant and palonosetron at absorption, binding, metabolic, or excretory level, thus highlighting their compatibility as the oral fixed combination NEPA, with administration convenience that may reduce dosing mistakes and increase treatment compliance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587462PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1338DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

netupitant palonosetron
16
pharmacokinetic profiles
12
netupitant
10
palonosetron
10
profiles netupitant
8
oral fixed
8
fixed combination
8
receptor antagonist
8
cancer patients
8
metabolized cytochrome
8

Similar Publications

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common complications after gastrointestinal (GI) tumor surgery under general anesthesia that hinder recovery. This retrospective study, conducted from May to September 2023 at Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA) in reducing PONV in such patients.

Methods: All patients received one NEPA capsule orally the evening before surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Because no conclusive data demonstrate superiority among NK receptor antagonists (RA), existing antiemetic guidelines regard them as interchangeable. This individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis compared the efficacy of NEPA (netupitant/fosnetupitant) and aprepitant/fosaprepitant-based regimens in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

Materials & Methods: Head-to-head comparative studies published between 2003 and 2022 that evaluated antiemetic prophylaxis of aprepitant or fosaprepitant versus oral or intravenous (IV) NEPA in patients with various cancers receiving highly (HEC) or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) were identified through a literature search.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) significantly impact patients' quality of life and treatment adherence, with high incidence rates despite the use of antiemetic prophylaxis. While international guidelines provide recommendations for managing CINV, the diverse healthcare landscape in India necessitates tailored, region-specific guidelines. This study was conducted to develop and validate consensus-based clinical statements on CINV management tailored to the Indian context, aiming to enhance the quality of cancer care across the nation by aligning international insights with local experiences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Netupitant 300 mg/palonosetron 0.5 mg (NEPA) would be ideal as antiemetic prophylaxis for patients receiving weekly cisplatin, as it would reduce concurrent medication intake compared to the 3-day aprepitant regimen. However, due to the longer half-life of netupitant (~ 88 h), weekly administration could potentially lead to accumulation and toxicity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Addition of olanzapine to NK-1 receptor antagonist regimen improves chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prevention for highly emetogenic chemotherapies (HECs). However, the benefit of addition of NK-1 receptor antagonist to olanzapine regimen has not been demonstrated. This study compared the efficacy of upfront and subsequent addition of netupitant- to olanzapine-containing regimen for preventing CINV from high-dose cisplatin (≥ 75 mg/m).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF