Hot Topic: Title IV-E MSW Education and "Intent to Stay" in Public Child Welfare.

Soc Work

L. Christian Carr, MA, is statistics consultant, Patrick Leung, PhD, is professor, and Monit Cheung, PhD, is professor, Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston.

Published: January 2019


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The 2018 proposed Family First Prevention Services Act suggests a change in the funding formula of Title IV-E of the Social Security Act-from entitlement to block grants. This study aimed to support the continuation of entitlement support based on the evidence that Title IV-E educational programs are effective in improving retention after the workers have obtained an MSW degree. Using a multigroup, multiple regression approach, this study analyzed secondary data collected from an e-survey sent to public child welfare (PCW) workers in a southern state. Data from 1,025 workers compare "intent to stay" (ITS) factors between PCW workers who received and those who did not receive the Title IV-E MSW educational stipend. The main analysis was conducted using Mplus version 7.4, with R version 3.3.2 used for data screening. Findings indicate that Title IV-E-supported education moderates the strength of the following ITS factors: respect from coworkers, team cohesion, self-assessed skills in working with special needs clients, and holding an MSW degree. MSW holders expressed lower ITS levels unless they had received Title IV-E stipends. These results provide evidence that Title IV-E education could help retain MSW graduates in PCW.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sw/swy051DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

title iv-e
24
iv-e msw
8
"intent stay"
8
public child
8
child welfare
8
evidence title
8
msw degree
8
pcw workers
8
title
7
iv-e
6

Similar Publications

The child welfare system (CWS) in the United States faces persistent challenges in serving families from underserved communities, particularly those from Latine and African American/Black backgrounds and rural areas. These families encounter multiple barriers, including language and cultural differences and a lack of local services and access to transportation, which impede access to essential parenting programs. In response to the 2018 Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA) and other policy initiatives, the PRESERVE & CONNECT project aims to evaluate the efficacy of the Breakthrough Parenting Curriculum: Navigating Trauma Across Generations (BPC)-a trauma-informed and culturally-responsive parenting intervention-in preventing child maltreatment and promoting child and family well-being.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA) allows states to use federal Title IV-E funds to provide time-limited, clinically appropriate use of congregate care, including Qualified Residential Treatment Programs (QRTPs), for youth in foster care. October 1, 2021 marked the deadline for states to begin implementing these FFPSA congregate care reforms. From June to September 2022, we conducted a mixed-methods study to obtain a baseline understanding of implementation barriers, successes, and recommendations to inform congregate care policy and practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Child abuse, particularly neglect, is often preventable because many causes of harm stem from poverty, lack of social connections, substance use disorders, mental illness, lack of childcare, and other family support shortages. Prevention of child abuse and neglect starts with family support in these areas. The federal government recognized this need for prevention, and through considerable bipartisan support, passed the Family First Prevention Services Act on February 9, 2018.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A growing body of research has focused on the relationships of policies and other macro factors and child welfare outcomes. However, to date, few studies have examined state child welfare policies and reunification, despite reunification being the priority case goal among children in foster care.

Objective: This study examined the relationship between state child welfare policies and other macro factors and reunification, while controlling for child factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF