Hearing Disability Prevalence and Risk Factors in Two Recent National Surveys.

Am J Prev Med

Hearing Loss Prevention Team, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Published: September 2018


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Hearing loss is a worldwide societal and public health concern. Globally, disabling hearing loss affects 538 million adults (men, 12.2%; women, 9.8%). This study examined the prevalence and risk factors associated with deafness or serious difficulty hearing in two nationally representative surveys.

Methods: Data were analyzed in 2017 from the 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and the 2014 National Health Interview Survey. The BRFSS collected data through telephone interviews. The 2014 National Health Interview Survey collected face-to-face household interview data that included a hearing health supplement in the Sample Adult Core. Both surveys asked adults aged ≥18 years the disability question on deafness or serious difficulty hearing as defined by the American Community Survey. Weighted prevalence, prevalence ratios, and 95% CIs were calculated. Logistic regression was used to adjust for sociodemographic and geographic characteristics.

Results: Prevalence of deafness or serious difficulty hearing was 5.8% (BRFSS) and 6.0% (National Health Interview Survey); males had a 60% higher prevalence than females. The prevalence was significantly associated with increasing age, lower educational level and income, and was higher among non-Hispanic whites than among non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics. Deafness or serious difficulty hearing was strongly associated with increasing degree of self-reported trouble hearing in the National Health Interview Survey. The BRFSS state-specific prevalence varied from 3.8% to 13.3%, with higher prevalence in the most public health-challenged states according to America's Health Rankings.

Conclusions: The prevalence of deafness or serious difficulty hearing was approximately 6% in the National Health Interview Survey and BRFSS, but increased considerably for older, less advantaged individuals and in more public health-challenged states.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296353PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deafness serious
20
serious difficulty
20
difficulty hearing
20
national health
20
health interview
20
interview survey
20
survey brfss
12
hearing
10
prevalence
10
prevalence risk
8

Similar Publications

Seeing speech: Neural mechanisms of cued speech perception in prelingually deaf and hearing users.

Imaging Neurosci (Camb)

June 2025

Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Paris, France.

For many deaf people, lip-reading plays a major role in verbal communication. However, lip movements are by nature ambiguous, so that lip-reading does not allow for a full understanding of speech. The resulting language access difficulties may have serious consequences on language, cognitive and social development.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Adolescents and young adults are among those most often impacted by invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), and survivors are often left with serious and permanent physical, neurological, psychological, or systemic complications. We conducted this targeted literature review with the primary goal of identifying evidence and evidence gaps relating to long-term health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and economic impacts for survivors who contracted IMD during adolescence or early adulthood and their caregivers.

Methods: We searched electronic databases and gray literature for studies assessing long-term clinical, HRQoL, and economic outcomes for patients who survived IMD in the US or Canada.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev

June 2025

Ear Health, The Kids Research Institute Australia, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

Background: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), sometimes referred to as chronic otitis media (COM), is a chronic inflammation and often polymicrobial infection of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, characterised by ear discharge (otorrhoea) through a perforated tympanic membrane. The predominant symptoms of CSOM are ear discharge and hearing loss. Systemic antibiotics are commonly used to treat people with CSOM.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), sometimes referred to as chronic otitis media (COM), is a chronic inflammation and often polymicrobial infection of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, characterised by ear discharge (otorrhoea) through a perforated tympanic membrane. The predominant symptoms of CSOM are ear discharge and hearing loss. Topical antiseptics, a possible treatment for CSOM, inhibit the micro-organisms that may be responsible for the infection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), sometimes referred to as chronic otitis media, is a chronic inflammation and often polymicrobial infection of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, characterised by ear discharge (otorrhoea) through a perforated tympanic membrane. The predominant symptoms of CSOM are ear discharge and hearing loss. Antibiotics are the most common treatment for CSOM, and aim to kill or inhibit the growth of micro-organisms that may be responsible for the infection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF