Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) scores in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have not been fully described in the literature to date. The ability of preoperative patient-reported outcome scores to directly predict postoperative outcomes in patients who undergo primary ACL reconstruction is unknown.

Hypothesis: Postoperative PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression (D) scores in patients who undergo ACL reconstruction will show improvement when compared with preoperative scores. Additionally, preoperative PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores will predict which patients will not achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) postoperatively.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: A total of 233 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction between 2015 and 2016 and had completed PROMIS measures both preoperatively (within 60 days of surgery) and postoperatively (100-240 days after surgery) were included in this study. PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores were compared. Accuracy analyses were performed to determine whether preoperative PROMIS scores from each domain could predict postoperative achievement of MCID in the same domain. Cutoff scores were then calculated.

Results: PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores all showed a significant improvement after ACL reconstruction (all < .001). Preoperative scores from all 3 PROMIS domains showed a strong ability to predict clinically meaningful improvement, as defined by MCID, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.72 to 0.84. Optimal cutoffs for preoperative PROMIS scores showed that patients with a PF score of <42.5, PI score of >56.2, or D score of >44.8 were more likely to achieve MCID.

Conclusion: PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores improved significantly in patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction. Preoperative PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores were highly predictive of outcome in the early postoperative period. The reported cutoff scores showed high probability in predicting which patients would and would not achieve a clinically meaningful improvement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946616PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118771286DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

promis scores
32
acl reconstruction
28
preoperative promis
20
primary acl
16
scores
15
predict postoperative
12
scores patients
12
promis
11
preoperative
8
postoperative outcomes
8

Similar Publications

Background: A clear understanding of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) is essential for effectively implementing patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) as a performance measure for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Since not achieving MCID and SCB may reflect suboptimal surgical benefit, the primary aim of this study was to use machine learning to predict patients who may not achieve the threshold-based outcomes (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/objectives: Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) frequently experience sleep disturbances. Melatonin, an over-the-counter supplement, is increasingly used in the general pediatric population; however, its prevalence and perceived effectiveness in children with AD remain unclear.

Methods: Caregivers of pediatric patients (ages 1-17 years) with physician-diagnosed AD completed surveys on melatonin use, Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and age-appropriate sleep questionnaires.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly common in orthopaedic research yet routinely fail to detect clinically meaningful differences in clinical trials. We assessed if orthopaedic studies are more likely to detect clinically important differences with a binary outcome, such as nonunion surgery, or a continuous patient-reported outcome sensitive to important clinical differences.

Methods: We constructed a hypothetical clinical trial comparing 2 treatments for tibial shaft fractures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Sacroiliac joint fusion is performed to stabilize and fuse the joint in patients with degenerative sacroiliitis and joint dysfunction. While several posterior techniques and implants exist as alternatives to lateral approaches, biomechanical and clinical performance data for these systems used as standalone remains limited. This article provides a preliminary cadaveric and clinical assessment of a novel posterior intra-articular sacroiliac fusion implant system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The reliance on patient reported outcomes (PROs) has substantially increased not only to augment current metrics of clinical success, but to capture the patient's perspective on the benefit of their treatment. As more PROs become utilized, the time and cost of longitudinal data collection and survey fatigue must be tempered with the benefit of the data collected. Therefore, this study sought to assess the responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) compared to the PROMIS-10 Global Health Survey physical function T-score (PFT) and mental health T-score (MHT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF