A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Intraoperative Device Closure of Isolated Ventricular Septal Defects: Experience on 1,090 Cases. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: This study summarizes the clinical experience and 8-year follow-up results of the intraoperative device closure of ventricular septal defects (VSD).

Methods: From January 2009 to June 2017, 1,090 patients with isolated VSD were enrolled at our institute to participate in the study. The procedure involved a small lower sternal incision that was performed after full evaluation of VSD by transesophageal/transthoracic echocardiographic (TEE/TTE) guidance and the deployment of a domestically made occluder to close the VSD periventricularly and off cardiopulmonary bypass. Follow-up was in the first 3 months and then every 1 to 2 years with TTE, electrocardiography, and upon symptoms.

Results: In all, 1,033 patients were occluded successfully under this approach, and the remaining patients were converted to surgical repair. The size of the occluder deployed ranged from 6 to 14 mm and included 825 symmetric devices and 208 asymmetric devices. A total of 25 patients developed severe arrhythmias, including 11 cases of complete atrioventricular block and 14 cases of Mobitz type II atrioventricular block, during and after the procedure.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive transthoracic device closure of VSD with an asymmetric or symmetric domestically made device on a beating heart is a safe and feasible alternative to conventional surgical repair. More experience in multicenter and long-term follow-up is necessary to assess the actual feasibility and safety of this procedure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.059DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

device closure
12
intraoperative device
8
ventricular septal
8
septal defects
8
surgical repair
8
atrioventricular block
8
closure isolated
4
isolated ventricular
4
defects experience
4
experience 1090
4

Similar Publications