98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often undergo AV junction ablation (AVJA) and pacemaker implantation. Right ventricular (RV) pacing contributes to increased risk of heart failure (HF), which may be mitigated by biventricular pacing. We sought to determine the impact of AVJA concurrent with RV versus biventricular pacemaker implantation on AF and HF hospitalizations.
Methods And Results: The MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental claims database was used to select 18- to 100-year-old patients with AF with pacemaker implantation. Patients were divided into those with an RV and a biventricular pacemaker and further into those who did (AVJA) or did not undergo concurrent ablation. Separately, the AVJA group was divided into those receiving RV versus biventricular pacemakers. AF and HF hospitalization rates were compared between groups after matching on demographics, comorbidities, and baseline hospitalization rates. The study included 24 361 patients, with RV (n=23 377) or biventricular (n=984) pacemakers; 1611 patients underwent AVJA. AVJA was associated with reduced AF hospitalization risk (RV hazard ratio [HR], 0.31; <0.001; biventricular HR, 0.20; =0.003) compared with no AVJA. However, HF hospitalization risk was increased for RV (HR, 1.63; =0.001), but not biventricular (HR, 0.98; =0.942), pacemakers. In AVJA patients, biventricular pacing was associated with reduced risk of HF hospitalization versus RV pacing (HR, 0.62; =0.017).
Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients with AF, AVJA significantly reduced AF hospitalizations, irrespective of whether an RV or a biventricular pacemaker was implanted. However, AVJA was associated with a marked HF hospitalization increase in patients with an RV pacemaker, which was ameliorated with biventricular pacing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779040 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007270 | DOI Listing |
JTCVS Open
August 2025
Division of Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Objective: To compare early and long-term clinical outcomes of bioprosthetic versus mechanical (On-X) mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients aged 65 years and older.
Methods: This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients equal to or older than 65 years underwent isolated MVR from 2005 to 2023. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare early- and long-term clinical outcomes between patients with bioprostheses and mechanical On-X valve.
JTCVS Open
August 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Objective: To evaluate the early postoperative morbidity, mortality, and prosthetic conduit function of patients who underwent aortic root replacement using a prefabricated bioprosthetic aortic valved conduit.
Methods: Single-center retrospective review of 124 consecutive adult patients who underwent aortic root replacement with a certified prefabricated bioprosthetic aortic valved conduit from 2021 to December 2023.
Results: Indications for operation were aortic aneurysms (n = 92), endocarditis (n = 12), deterioration of prior valve prosthesis (n = 13), and aortic dissection (n = 6).
Objective: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) represent less-invasive alternatives to conventional surgical aortic valve replacement. In contrast to Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Database data revealing <10% of all surgical aortic valve replacement procedures are performed via a minimally invasive approach, our center performs a high volume of MIAVR procedures. This propensity-score matched study aims to compare the outcomes of MIAVR versus TAVR in low-risk patients (STS Predicted Risk of Mortality <4%).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJTCVS Open
August 2025
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Northwestern Medicine Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Chicago, Ill.
Objective: Limited data are available on treatment of atrial fibrillation during ascending aortic aneurysm and aortic valve surgery. Ablation at the time of isolated aortic valve surgery has a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Class I indication. We sought to determine early and late outcomes of concomitant atrial fibrillation surgery at the time of ascending aortic aneurysm + aortic valve surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicine (Baltimore)
September 2025
King Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Background: Mitral valve surgery is a widely performed intervention for the treatment of various mitral valve pathologies. Postoperative conduction disturbances may necessitate permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. This study aims to identify and quantify patient-related, cardiovascular, procedural risk factors, and risk score-based predictors of PPM implantation following mitral valve surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF