98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background And Objective: Modern sulfonylureas like glimepiride offer effective glycemic control with extrapancreatic benefits and good tolerability. The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare safety and efficacy of glimepiride and sitagliptin in combination with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Methods: In this open-label, randomized, comparative, multicenter study, a total of 305 T2DM patients who were either drug naïve or uncontrolled on metformin were randomized to glimepiride 1 or 2 mg/sustained-release metformin 1000 mg once daily (glimepiride group, = 202) or sitagliptin 50 mg/metformin 500 mg twice daily (sitagliptin group, = 103) for 12 weeks. Primary endpoint was change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Secondary endpoints were change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), body mass index (BMI) and to assess overall safety profile.
Results: At 12 weeks, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean HbA1c reduction in glimepiride group (0.42%) as compared to sitagliptin group (0.30%) ( = 0.001). Mean reduction in FPG and PPG was also statistically significant in the glimepiride group as compared to the sitagliptin group ( = 0.008). There was no significant difference in terms of change in BMI (0.07 ± 0.39 kg/m vs. 0.08 ± 0.31 kg/m) in glimepiride and sitagliptin groups, respectively, ( = 0.644) between both the groups. The incidences of hypoglycemic events were also comparable among both the groups.
Conclusion: In T2DM patients, glimepiride/metformin combination exhibited significant reduction in glycemic parameters as compared to sitagliptin/metformin combination. Moreover, there was no significant difference between both the groups in terms of change in BMI and incidence of hypoglycemia.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628548 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_176_17 | DOI Listing |
PLoS One
June 2025
Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Background: The World Health Organization suggests selecting essential medicines based on availability, accessibility, affordability, cost-effectiveness, and safety and efficacy. We examined Oral Hypoglycemic Agents (OHAs) for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Essential Medicines and Health Supplies List for Uganda (EMHSLU), assessed all criteria, and proposed alternative medicines to improve cost-savings and health outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a literature review followed by budget impact analysis (BIA) to evaluate potential cost-savings from refining EMHSLU.
Diabetes Care
July 2025
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Objective: To compare rates of and risk factors for hospitalizations among Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE) participants taking metformin and randomly assigned to insulin glargine U-100, glimepiride, liraglutide, or sitagliptin.
Research Design And Methods: Intention-to-treat (ITT) (N = 5,047) and on-assigned-treatment (AT) (N = 4,830) data sets were used. Baseline differences between those hospitalized versus those not hospitalized were assessed.
JAMA Intern Med
July 2025
Division of Endocrinology, Kaiser Permanente of Georgia, Atlanta.
Importance: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a risk factor for cognitive impairment. Whether the choice of the second-line glucose-lowering treatment added to metformin or glycemic control affects cognitive performance in T2D of relatively short duration (<10 years) is not known.
Objective: To compare the relative effect of 4 classes of glucose-lowering medications that were randomly added to metformin on cognitive performance and to examine the association of longitudinal glycemic levels with cognitive performance.
Diabetes Care
June 2025
The Biostatistics Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD.
Objective: Weight gain with glucose-lowering medications may interfere with effective type 2 diabetes (T2D) management. We evaluated weight change and the effect of weight gain on outcomes over 5 years on four diabetes medications.
Research Design And Methods: The Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE) randomized trial compared the addition of insulin glargine, glimepiride, liraglutide, or sitagliptin to metformin in participants with T2D.
Diabetes Care
April 2025
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, and VA Eastern Colorado Health Care, Denver, CO.
Objective: To evaluate how model-based parameters of β-cell function change with glucose-lowering treatment and associate with glycemic deterioration in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Research Design And Methods: In the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE), β-cell function parameters derived from mathematical modeling of oral glucose tolerance tests were assessed at baseline (N = 4,712) and 1, 3, and 5 years following randomization to insulin glargine, glimepiride, liraglutide, or sitagliptin, added to baseline metformin. Parameters included insulin secretion rate (ISR), glucose sensitivity (insulin response to glucose), rate sensitivity (early insulin response), and potentiation.