A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Multicenter comparison of the new Cobas 6800 system with Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan and Abbott RealTime for the quantification of HIV, HBV and HCV viral load. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The new Roche Cobas 6800 platform (C6800) has been recently introduced for viral load (VL) measurement.

Objectives: Comparing C6800 to Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan v2.0 (CAP/CTM) for the quantification of HIV, HBV and HCV viremia, and to the Abbott RealTime assay (ABB) for HCV quantification.

Study Design: We analysed 121 samples for HBV, and 139 for HIV-1 including 2 groupO and 137 group M viruses (36.5% subtype B, 27.0% CRF02_AG, 22.6% from other clades, and 14% subtype not available). For the 100 HCV samples compared with CAP/CTM, 42% were genotype 1 and 17% were genotype 4. For the 68 HCV samples compared with ABB, 52.9% were genotype 1 and 22.1% were genotype 4.

Results: C6800 results correlated well with those of CAP/CTM for all three viruses (R: 0.97-0.99). However, C6800 can yield different viraemia results: higher for HIV (mean difference: +0.11 logcopies/mL, p<0.0001), and lower for HBV (mean difference:-0.11 log IU/mL, p<0.0001). Differences exceeded 0.5 log for 6.5% of HIV-1 samples and 7.4% of HBV samples. For HCV quantification, C6800 gave mostly lower values than the other assays towards the bottom of the range, and higher values in the upper part of the range, especially in comparisons with ABB, for which 28% of differences exceeded 0.5 log IU/mL. No particular HCV genotype was identified as responsible for these differences.

Conclusion: Overall, the comparison tests between C6800 and CAP/CTM systems are satisfactory for the three viruses. Frequent discrepancies were observed between C6800 and ABB for HCV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2017.09.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cobas 6800
8
cobas ampliprep/cobas
8
ampliprep/cobas taqman
8
abbott realtime
8
quantification hiv
8
hiv hbv
8
hbv hcv
8
viral load
8
hcv samples
8
samples compared
8

Similar Publications