Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

We investigated correlations between diagnosis according to the 2015 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of unresected lung tumours, molecular analysis and TTF1 expression in small biopsy and cytology specimens from 344 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. One case failed testing for EGFR, KRAS and ALK abnormalities and six had insufficient tumour for ALK testing. Overall mutation rate in 343 cases was 48% for the genes tested, with 19% EGFR, 33% KRAS and 4% BRAF mutations, and 5% ALK rearrangements detected. More EGFR-mutant (78%) and ALK-rearranged (75%) tumours had morphologic adenocarcinoma than KRAS-mutant (56%) tumours. Despite no significant difference in the overall rate of any molecular abnormality between morphologic adenocarcinoma (52%) and NSCLC, favour adenocarcinoma (47%) (p = 0.18), KRAS mutations were detected more frequently in the latter group. No significant difference in the overall rate of any molecular abnormality between TTF1 positive (49%) and TTF1 negative tumours (44%) (p = 0.92) was detected, but more EGFR-mutant (97%) and ALK-rearranged tumours (92%) were TTF1 positive than KRAS-mutant tumours (68%). Rates of EGFR, KRAS and BRAF mutations and ALK rearrangements in this Australian NSCLC patient population are consistent with the published international literature. Our findings suggest that 2015 WHO classification of unresected tumours may assist in identifying molecular subsets of advanced NSCLC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2017.07.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

classification unresected
12
molecular analysis
8
diagnosis 2015
8
2015 classification
8
unresected lung
8
tumours
8
lung tumours
8
ttf1 expression
8
expression small
8
cytology specimens
8

Similar Publications

We reviewed the current status and perspectives on salvage esophagectomy for initially unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the era of minimally invasive surgery and immunotherapy. Although the standard treatment for these patients is definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the complete response rate to CRT alone remains unsatisfactory. Salvage esophagectomy, which is defined as surgery for residual or recurrent lesions after definitive CRT, is considered a curative treatment in clinical practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Enteric-type thymic adenocarcinomas are an extremely rare and distinct subtype of thymic malignancies, as classified by the 2021 World Health Organization classification of thymic tumors. These tumors exhibit close molecular and morphologic similarity to primary gastrointestinal malignancies. To date, there are no tailored treatment guidelines for enteric-type thymic adenocarcinoma.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Conversion therapies after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) provide curative surgery chance and prolong survival for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, only some patients have the opportunity to receive conversion therapies. To this end, we aimed to develop and validate a machine-learning model to identify patients who may have the chance to undergo conversion therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: HCC is the leading form of primary liver cancer worldwide. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (T) is commonly used to treat unresectable tumors. T combined with antiangiogenic therapy and immunotherapy (AI) has shown significant progress in neoadjuvant treatment, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Surgical resection remains central to the curative treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer (GC), yet global variability persists in defining resectability, particularly in complex scenarios such as multivisceral invasion, positive peritoneal cytology (CY1), or oligometastatic disease. The Intercontinental Criteria of Resectability for Gastric Cancer (ICRGC) project was developed to address this gap by combining expert surgical input with artificial intelligence (AI)-based reasoning.

Methods: A two-stage prospective survey was conducted during the 2024 European Gastric Cancer Association (EGCA) meeting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF