Neural systems for evaluating speaker (Un)believability.

Hum Brain Mapp

School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.

Published: July 2017


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Our voice provides salient cues about how confident we sound, which promotes inferences about how believable we are. However, the neural mechanisms involved in these social inferences are largely unknown. Employing functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined the brain networks and individual differences underlying the evaluation of speaker believability from vocal expressions. Participants (n = 26) listened to statements produced in a confident, unconfident, or "prosodically unmarked" (neutral) voice, and judged how believable the speaker was on a 4-point scale. We found frontal-temporal networks were activated for different levels of confidence, with the left superior and inferior frontal gyrus more activated for confident statements, the right superior temporal gyrus for unconfident expressions, and bilateral cerebellum for statements in a neutral voice. Based on listener's believability judgment, we observed increased activation in the right superior parietal lobule (SPL) associated with higher believability, while increased left posterior central gyrus (PoCG) was associated with less believability. A psychophysiological interaction analysis found that the anterior cingulate cortex and bilateral caudate were connected to the right SPL when higher believability judgments were made, while supplementary motor area was connected with the left PoCG when lower believability judgments were made. Personal characteristics, such as interpersonal reactivity and the individual tendency to trust others, modulated the brain activations and the functional connectivity when making believability judgments. In sum, our data pinpoint neural mechanisms that are involved when inferring one's believability from a speaker's voice and establish ways that these mechanisms are modulated by individual characteristics of a listener. Hum Brain Mapp 38:3732-3749, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6866933PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23630DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

believability judgments
12
neural mechanisms
8
mechanisms involved
8
believability
8
neutral voice
8
higher believability
8
neural systems
4
systems evaluating
4
evaluating speaker
4
speaker unbelievability
4

Similar Publications

This article proposes minimum requirements for reporting efficacy in treatment studies of compulsive sexual behavior (CSB). CSB disorder (CSBD) is a condition whose diagnostic criteria were only recently defined by the World Health Organization. Multiple primary and secondary outcomes have been used in treatment trials of CSB, and possible neuropsychological measures have been considered.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The current study explores the relation between how children evaluate their knowledge when thinking only about what they know (i.e., absolute knowledge) and when they compare their knowledge to that of an expert (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use M10 guideline provides a global framework for bioanalytical method validation in studies intended for regulatory submission. While its structure ensures consistency and data reliability, the guideline also acknowledges that not all studies require the same level of validation. This paper examines where full compliance is essential and where scientific judgment allows for leaner, context-driven validation, such as in early-stage development, for additional matrices, metabolites, nonstandard biological matrices or studies intended for internal decision-making.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Some scholars argue that punishment communicates information about punished individuals. We extended this theorizing by asking whether laypeople (237 5- to 6-year-olds, 221 7- to 8-year-olds, 220 adults) understand punishment as communicating messages about individuals not directly implicated in punishment-related scenarios and how this understanding might change across development. Three studies asked U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Thousands of Veterans file claims for military sexual trauma (MST)-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) disability through the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) annually to receive covered healthcare benefits and monthly nontaxable compensation for MST-related conditions. Although 72% of MST claims in 2021 were granted, prior reporting found other claims had been erroneously denied due to issues around VA staff not ordering disability exams for claims and not gathering necessary evidence on behalf of claimants. The present study explores decision-making processes around evidence-gathering for MST-related disability claims through interviews with VA staff who develop, rate, and evaluate MST disability claims (n = 21).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF